0
An arbitrator is a person or some times an ad hoc (for the duration of the arbitration) body, who will evaluate a conflict or litigation by the versions presented by each side. The arbitrator will then, after careful analysis, issue a decision that most often is binding and obligatory, resolving and concluding the conflict or litigation.
Arbitrators differ from mediators in that a mediator has the purpose to make the sides agree on middle terms while an arbitrator does not strive for the agreement between the parties but for a resolution of the conflict in a fair manner and according to justice.
Most often, conflicts and litigations may first be submitted to a mediator and only if the mediation fails, the problem will be submitted to an arbitrator.
An example of arbitrators, are judges, but in international relations as well as in commercial and private issues, arbitrators may be appointed who usually have background and are graduated in law and have or are assisted by someone having experience in interpersonal psychology.
What else can I help you with?
What happens if an arbitrator makes a mistake in a conclusion of law?
The decision rendered by a private arbitrator is "99.9 %" binding and neither party can appeal the result. Even "an error of law apparent on the face of the [decision] that causes substantial injustice does not provide grounds for [an appeal]." California Supreme Court in the Moncharsh decision (1992). In other words, if the arbitrator adds 2 + 2 and says that totals 5, too bad, his or her decision cannot be appealed to the courts to correct the error. Added: The above answer may be true and applicable in California, but it is not the prevailing rule in all states. Judgements made by lesser judicial officers, arbitrators, magistrates, justices of the peace, etc, are subject to the review and over-rule by a judge of the appropriate court. If the arbitrator (et al) makes an error that is not caught by the judge, the aribitrator's ruling may be appealed and possibly overturned by higher judicial authority.
How do you use the word arbitrator in a sentence?
After I refused to pay my credit card bill, the credit card company requested arbitration to order me to pay. Arbitration settles what mediation cannot. A difficult labor dispute was finally settled by binding arbitration.
What does the term legal cases refer to?
A legal case refers to a dispute between 2 people or parties, that will be resolved by a judge or an arbitrator. The decision made by the judge or arbitrator will be upheld by a court of law or similar legal entity. These legal cases will be considered either civil or criminal and tried accordingly.
What territories claimed by the Philippines by historic rights and legal title?
Territories claimed by the PhilippinesSpratly IslandsPhilippines claim 52 features in the Spratly Island Group. Among these, Philippines were only able to occupy 7 islands and 2 reefs. These include Thitu (Pagasa) island (2nd largest), West York (Likas) island (3rd largest), Northeast (Parola) cay (5th largest), Nanshan (Lawak) island, Loaita (Kota) island, Flat (Patag) island, Lankiam (Panata) cay, Commodore (Rizal) reef, Irving (Balagtas) reef and Second Thomas (Ayungin) reef. Other features claimed by the Philippines were either occupied by Vietnam, China, Taiwan or Malaysia or unoccupied by any other countries. Parts of Spratly Islands group that is not claimed by the Philippines are those that are near to Vietnam. The farthest feature that they claim is Ladd Reef which is nearer to and occupied by Vietnam. Philippines established a municipality named Kalayaan under the province of Palawan for all the features they occupied.See Spratly Islands for more details.SabahThe status of the territory of Sabah, previously known as North Borneo, is currently disputed between Malaysia and the Philippines. Presently, Sabah is one of the states that formed Malaysia in 1963. Despite that, the Philippines and the heirs of the Sultanate of Sulu have made claims to the territory though the claim is currently dormant. On 23 January 1878, in exchange for modern weapons with which to keep Spanish colonizers away from the Sulu Archipelago, the ruler ofSulu, Sultan Jamalul Alam, leased the territory of North Borneo to Gustavus von Overbeck, an Austrian who was then the Austro-Hungarian Empire's consul-general in Hong Kong. This was accomplished via a trading company belonging to von Overbeck's British partner Alfred Dent, and later via the British North Borneo Company. Von Overbeck procured the necessary firearms and also paid the Muslim dignitary an annual sum equivalent to 5,000 Malaysian dollars (now known as ringgit).The key word in the agreement was "padjak," which has been translated by American, Dutch and Spanish linguists to mean "lease" or "arrendamiento." The agreement further states explicitly that the rights to the territory may not be transferred to a nation or another company without the sultan's expressed permission.In 1906 and in 1920, the United States formally reminded Great Britain that North Borneo did not belong to the Crown and was still part of the Sultanate of Sulu. However, the British did turn Sabah into a Crown leased Colony. The Philippine Constitution of 1941 states that the national territory of the Philippines included, among other things, "all other areas which belong to the Philippines on the basis of historical rights or legal claims." Malaysia was federated in 16 September 1963. Even before Sabah was incorporated into Malaysia, the Philippines sent delegations to London reminding the British Crown that Sabah belonged to the Philippines.Malaysia insists that Sabah is under the sovereignty of Malaysia based on the fact that under agreements that Baron von Overbeck and Alfred Dent secured with the Brunei Sultanate on 29 December 1877 and the Sulu Sultanate on 22 January 1878, the sultanate of Sulu agreed to lease Sabah to Malaysia. The British Crown renewed the lease on 15 July 1946, but finally ceded Sabah to Malaysia on 16 September 1963. Malaysia is still believed to be paying the annual rent to the Sultan of Sulu.Malaysian control was further strengthened by two referendums: the first facilitated by the United Nations-backed Cobbold Commission, from February to April 1962 and the second before the formation of Malaysia in September 1963. Both referendums recorded 70% of Sabahan population voting for Sabah to be part of Malaysia.Scarborough ShoalThe Scarborough Shoal or Panatag Shoal or Huangyan Island (黄岩岛), more correctly described as a group of islands, atolls, and reefs than a shoal, is located in the Luzon Sea or South China Sea. The nearest landmass is Palauig town, Zambales province, Luzon Island, with only 221 kilometers. It is about 123 miles west of Subic Bay. Both the Philippines and the People's Republic of China claim it.The Philippines base their claim on its proximity, its Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), and the principle of terra nullius (which can only be valid if no one ever owned it before).The Chinese basis for claim is that the shoal would have been first discovered by Chinese in the 13th century and historically used by Chinese fishermen.Many Chinese fishermen were already[when?] arrested here by the Philippine Navy for using illegal fishing methods and catching of endangered sea species.Palmas or Miangas IslandMain article: Island of Palmas CaseIt involved a territorial dispute over the Island of Palmas (or Miangas) between the Netherlands and the United States which was heard by thePermanent Court of Arbitration.This case is one of the most highly influential precedents dealing with island territorial conflicts.Palmas, also referred to as Miangas, is an island of little economic value or strategic location. It is two miles in length, three-quarters of a mile in width, and had a population of about 750 when the decision of the arbitrator was handed down. The island is located betweenMindanao, Philippines and the northernmost island, known as Nanusa, of what was the former Netherlands East Indies. In 1898, Spain ceded the Philippines to the United States and Palmas sat within the boundaries of that cession to the U.S. In 1906, the United States discovered that the Netherlands also claimed sovereignty over the island and the two parties agreed to submit to binding arbitration to resolve the dispute on January 23, 1925. The arbitrator in the case was Max Huber, a Swiss national.The question the arbitrator was to resolve was whether the Island of Palmas (Miangas), in its entirety, was a part of the territory of the United States or the Netherlands.The arbitrator ruled in favor of the Netherlands' position and stated that the Netherlands held actual title to Palmas:For these reasons The Arbitrator in conformity with Article I of the Special Agreement of January 23, 1925 DECIDES that : THE ISLAND OF PALMAS (or MIANGAS) forms in its entirety a part of the Netherlands territory done at The Hague, this fourth day of April 1928 Max Huber, Arbitrator Michiels van Verduynen, Secretary-GeneralIn the first of the United States' two arguments, the United States argued that it held the island because it had received actual title through legitimate treaties from the original "discoverer" of the island, Spain. The United States argued that Spain acquired title to Palmas when Spain discovered the island and the island was terra nullius. Spain's title to the island, because it was a part of the Philippines, was then ceded to the United States in the Treaty of Paris (1898) after Spain's defeat in the Spanish-American War. The arbitrator noted that no new international law invalidated the legal transfer of territory via cession.However, the arbitrator noted that Spain could not legally grant what it did not hold and the Treaty of Paris could not grant to the United States Palmas if Spain had no actual title to it. The arbitrator concluded that Spain held an inchoate title when Spain "discovered" Palmas. However, for a sovereign to maintain its initial title via discovery, the arbitrator said that the discoverer had to actually exercise authority, even if it were a simple an act as planting a flag on the beach. In this case, Spain did not exercise authority over the island after making an initial claim after discovery and so the United States' claim was based on relatively weak grounds.The United States also argued that Palmas was United States territory because the island was closer to the Philippines than to Indonesia, which was then held by the Netherlands East Indies. The arbitrator said there was no positive international law which favored the United States' approach of terra firma, where the nearest continent or island of considerable size gives title to the land in dispute. The arbitrator held that mere proximity was not an adequate claim to land noted that if the international community followed the proposed United States approach, it would lead to arbitrary results.The Netherlands' primary contention was that it held actual title because the Netherlands had exercised authority on the island since 1677. The arbitrator noted that the United States had failed to show documentation proving Spanish sovereignty on the island except those documents that specifically mentioned the island's discovery. Additionally, there was no evidence that Palmas was a part of the judicial or administrative organization of the Spanish government of the Philippines. However, the Netherlands showed that the East India Company had negotiated treaties with the local princes of the island since the 17th century and had exercised sovereignty, including a requirement of Protestantism and the denial of other nationals on the island. The arbitrator pointed out that if Spain had actually exercised authority, than there would have been conflicts between the two countries but none are provided in the evidence.Under the Palmas decision, three important rules for resolving island territorial disputes were decided:Firstly, title based on contiguity has no standing in international law. Secondly, title by discovery is only an inchoate title. Finally, if another sovereign begins to exercise continuous and actual sovereignty, (and the arbitrator required that the claim had to be open and public and with good title), and the discoverer does not contest this claim, the claim by the sovereign that exercises authority is greater than a title based on mere discovery.However, up to this day, several Philippine legislators claim that the island cannot be part of Indonesia today because the ethnic group living in this island is far more related by language to the Sarangani people of Mindanao than any ethnic group in Indonesia (eg, Minahasa). However this is not entirely true, since languages spoken in Miangas such as Sangir and Talaud are spoken also in North Sulawesi province with significant numbers.Currently, the Philippine Government has no desire to contest the sovereignty of Indonesian Government over Miangas Island and respect the Indonesian administration over the Island.
Who is roland nicholson jr?
Roland Nicholson Roland Nicholson, born February 8, 1950 was elected Chairman of the Fortune Society in 1997. He is an ordained minister and jazz bassist He is also a consultant and arbitrator specializing in election law. He earned a BA from Morgan State University in 1970 and a JD from the Hofstra University School of Law in 1974. He was selected to be a Reginald Heber Smith Law Fellow in 1974. Upon completion of his fellowship and active duty service as an Army officer Nicholson became a staff member of the New York State Legislature. In 1982 he was the co-author of a study which highlighted the fact that it was a much greater burden on taxpayers to execute an individual convicted of a capital crime than it was to keep that individual incarcerated for the remainder of his or her life. The rationale for this is the fact that when the cost of the legal procedures that are required to ensure a fair trial are calculated along with the cost of appeals and a Federal Habeas Corpus proceeding, it is far more expensive to kill the convicted person than it would be to feed and house the inmate for the remainder of her life. In 1997 he was elected chairman of the Fortune Society. Nicholson was raised in Baltimore, Maryland. He graduated from the Frederick Douglass High School. He currently resides in New York City & Stockbridge, MA. He is a member of the Electoral Reform Society (United Kingdom) and has been designated as an arbitrator by the mayor of Xian (PRC).
What is the final decision of an arbitrator called?
The final decision of an arbitrator is called a ruling. The final decision of an arbitrator is called an award.
What do you call a cook that leaves Arby's to work at McDonalds?
An Arbitrator
What is an arbitrator?
An arbitrement is a judgment of an arbitrator - an arbitraiton.
Who must approve the person selected as an arbitrator?
Management and labor must approve the arbitrator.
What are the release dates for The Arbitrator - 1904?
The Arbitrator - 1904 was released on: USA: January 1904
What is decision announced by an arbitrator?
An arbitrator is a third party who hears both sides of an argument and then makes an impartial decision. The decision announced by an arbitrator is often as binding as if it was announced by a judge.
What two disputing parties agree the appointment of an arbitrator they must abide by the rulesprocedures and comply with the?
Decision of the Arbitrator
When two disputing parties agree to the appointment of an arbitrator they must abide by the rules and comply with the?
Decision of the arbitrator
When can an arbitrator's decision and award be appealed to the courts?
An arbitrator's decision and award can typically be appealed to the courts only in limited circumstances, such as if there was misconduct or bias on the part of the arbitrator, or if the decision violates public policy.
Who oversee negotiations?
arbitrator
When two disputing parties agree to the appointment of an arbitrator they must abide by the rules procedures and comply with the?
Decision of the arbitrator
When two disputing parties agree to the appointment of an arbitrator they must abide by the rule procedures and comply with the?
Decision of the arbitrator
