0
What else can I help you with?
How do science and superstitious contradict each other?
Science observes what is, and seeks an understanding of why and how. Superstition adopts a story of why and how, and seeks evidence for it.
What is the importance of the parole evidence rule?
The parole evidence rule helps to disallow the evidence of an oral conversation in preference of a written document evidence. It disallows any other evidence that may be presented after signing of the contract.
Two arguments about a historical event contradict each other. How should historians determine which argument is superior?
Search for additional evidence to see which argument it supports.
What are the expectations of a juror?
A juror is expected to remain unbiased, listen to all evidence presented during the trial, follow the judge's instructions, deliberate with other jurors, and ultimately reach a fair and just verdict based on the evidence presented in court.
What was the evidence against Sarah good?
In "The Crucible" the evidence that Sarah Good was a witch was that she could not recite the ten commandments. Other evidence presented was that she confessed to witchcraft, and that she mumbled after being refused bread and cider.
How scientific principles and superstitious beliefs contradict each other?
How scientific principles and superstitious beliefs contradict
How scientific principles and superstitious beliefs contradict with each other?
How scientific principles and superstitious beliefs contradict
What are the two common types of evidence in a civil suit?
The two common types of evidence in a civil suit are testimonial evidence, which includes witness testimony, and documentary evidence, which consists of written records, photographs, emails, contracts, or any other physical evidence that can be presented in court.
What evidence is typically presented in a grand jury statement charging a crime?
A grand jury statement charging a crime typically includes evidence such as witness testimonies, physical evidence, documents, and any other relevant information that supports the accusation of a crime.
Will the judge accept money orders as proof of child support payment?
Maybe. It depends on all the other evidence, both oral and documentary, that is presented.
How did muckraker Ida tarbell describe standard oil?
It led to the breakup of the company as a monopoly.
How should historians determine which argument is superior if two arguments about an historical event contradict each other?
Historians should assess the evidence supporting each argument, consider the credibility of the sources, and evaluate the context in which the arguments were made. They may also look for consensus among other historians or seek additional evidence to support one argument over the other. Ultimately, the argument that is best supported by a preponderance of evidence and critical analysis is considered superior.
