Habeus Corpus. This literally means "you may have the body" which means that an accused person is to be brought forth to be officially charged in a court with having committed a crime, or of being subject to a judicial order.
The right to a speedy trial, which is guaranteed under the 6th Amendment.
The writ of habeas corpus
Prisoner
Officers have the right to search person as long as they can show propable cause.
If a person were imprisoned in the United States without being notified of the charges brought against him before a judge, this action would violate which constitutional right?
It is not right because if your a conscientious objector the person you imprisoned will imprison you if he gets out of prison and finds out you are one.
The likely context is "imprisoned without trial" or "imprisoned for things you did not do." Under the US Constitution, this could refer to the concept of "habeas corpus" (proof of a crime) and one's right to a fair and speedy trial, to legal representation, and to a trial by a jury of one's peers. There do still exist a number of situations, especially concerning terrorism, where individuals may find themselves detained without benefit of counsel or trial.
There were four main points. No taxes could be levied without the consent of Parliament. No English subject could be imprisoned without cause. No quartering of soldiers in citizens homes. No martial law may be used in peace time.
The right of people not to be imprisoned wrongfully is a fundamental human right that is protected by legal systems around the world. It ensures that individuals cannot be deprived of their liberty without due process of law, including a fair trial and the opportunity to challenge the legality of their confinement. Wrongful imprisonment violates this right and can have serious consequences for the individual, including loss of freedom, reputation, and potentially physical and mental health.
The act guarantees an ancient right - that no person can be detained without just cause. To translate: The act guarantees that any person who is arrested may challenge that arrest and detention before a court where the state must prove that the person is accused of some crime and if the state fails to prove this, the person must be set free without delay. This act was made void in part by the Patriot Act; the state need only claim that it is a matter of national security and the person maybe held without cause - and the Patriot Act provides a provision that the state need not prove the cause.
squatter
Question is not exactly clear. You can be "jailed" immediately after your arrest for "probable cause" and to be held for presentment before court. If by "jailed" you mean 'imprisoned,' then you may be referring to a Writ of 'Habeus Corpus' which compels the prosecution to show legal cause for your detention. If this is not the info you are seeking - please re-word and re-submit the question.