novanet- the powers of the federal government are explicitly granted by the constitution
This is a person who believes in the strict interpretation of the constitution.
When speaking about the US Constitution, a conservative political leader tends to regard the Constitution as a document that severely limits the powers of the Federal government. In other words, while some people see the Constitution as being "flexible" the conservative sees it not that flexible at all. Another term to fit the question is "Strict Constitutionalist".
novanet- the powers of the federal government are explicitly granted by the constitution
Such a judge would be called a "strict constructionist". This is because that judge would construe, or interpret, the Constitution in a strict way, keeping close to the literal meaning of the actual words used. in the Constitution.
Strict Constructionists
A strict constructionist believes the Constitution should be interpreted narrowly, sticking to the original intent of the framers. In contrast, a liberal constructionist believes the Constitution should be interpreted broadly to adapt to changing times and new circumstances. Strict constructionists tend to emphasize literal readings of the Constitution, while liberal constructionists focus on the broader principles and values underlying it.
Decentralists favored a strict interpretation of the Constitution.
A weak central government. a confederation, and individual rights.
That person would have a 'strict' construction view of the Constitution. The other view is termed a 'loose' construction. The loose view believes if the Constitution doesn't prohibit the act (or law) it is okay.
strict interputation
Granting Congress any power not explicitly granted by the Constitution will remove all limits on its power other than what Congress itself believes to be the good of the nation.Jefferson was a strict constructionist. He believed that the congress could exercise no power not specifically and explicitly mentioned in the constitution. Since the constitution nowhere mentions a bank he believed any law establishing a bank to be unconstitutional.Michael MontagneAs Secretary of State in Washington's administration Jefferson could not "veto" the National Bank. He argued against it, and debated Alexander Hamilton about its constitutionality, but he was in no position to veto anything.He was, as stated a strict constitutionalist, but later during his own administration he will be forced to recant this strict position when he must make the decision to buy the Louisiana Territory.
Hamilton was loose, whereas Jefferson was strict in interpreting the Constitution.