answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

That person would have a 'strict' construction view of the Constitution. The other view is termed a 'loose' construction. The loose view believes if the Constitution doesn't prohibit the act (or law) it is okay.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What Person interprets the constitution as allowing the federal government to take only those actions that the constitution specifically permits?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Why do you change the constitution?

You change The Constitution to make it better. You change The Constitution to make it better. The constitution is a set of guidelines or a framework for the government to work within. it limits the scope of government decisions. So if the people feel the constitution is either allowing the government to much power or not allowing enough power, people can change it to redress the imbalance, which either way it may swing.


What is the principle of the constitution in which people have supreme political power in the government?

What is the principle of the constitution in which people hace the supreme political power in government; also the practice of allowing each territory to decide for itself whether or not allowing slavery


What is the principle of the constitution in which people have the supreme political power in government?

What is the principle of the constitution in which people hace the supreme political power in government; also the practice of allowing each territory to decide for itself whether or not allowing slavery


How does the US Constitution maintain a republic system of government?

by allowing the public to elect representatives


How does the US Constitution maintain a republican form of government?

By allowing the public to elect representatives?


Why were people shocked by the constitution?

They were not shocked. The Constitution limited the roll of Government in many areas. The Constitution does not spell out any rights for us as a people, but explains to our Government what rights it has and what it has no business involving itself with. Too many peolple are demanding that their rights be taken away today under the guise of "help" from our Government. Allowing the Government the ability to "help" with something (such as health care) means that you are allowing the Government to dictate what is good and bad for you. The current sugar tax to stop the use of soda is one example of this. YOu want to be babysat, then expect to lose the ability to chose.


Three constitutional provisions that has helped to change your national government?

There are many things that have changed the national government. The initial setting up of the Constitution, not allowing segregation, and women's equal rights.


Has the US Constitution been a boon or a bane?

The US constitution has been a great boon for the the country itself, allowing a stable government to be implemented. The constitution may also be seen as a bane for the fact that its loose wording has created much political conflict, both today and in the past.


What are ways the constitution has hurt America?

Allowing amendments.


Why was the U.S. Constitution important?

The constitution is the most important document ever created in American History. It is such a valuable document because its the foundation of our country. The constitution outlines all of our rights as citizens. The constitution allows us to be protected by its amendments from each other and most importantly from the government.


What do civil liberarians most specifically believe?

Basically, they believe that the government should have as little to do with our lives as possible.......especially the day to day aspects of it. They believe that allowing the government to rule how we live is wrong and a blatant disregard to us a FREE United States Citizens.


The Constitution gives suggestions but does not state how the national government should be structured?

The Constitution provides a framework for separation of powers among the three branches of government (executive, legislative, judicial), establishes the powers of each branch, delineates their responsibilities, and outlines the rights of individuals. It leaves room for interpretation and flexibility in implementation, allowing for future adaptations as needed.