No, it would be illegal for the federal government to place such a restriction but not for smaller units of government to do so. This is assuming that you are referring to the United States' constitution and not a particular state. Powers not specifically taken by the federal government in the Constitution are granted to the states. This power is typically allowed to roll downhill to counties, towns, and even subdivisions.
A restricted deed community is governed by its governing documents. There, you will find out which residential parameters must be met.
Disadvantages of living in a deed restricted community may include limited freedom in property use, potential additional fees for maintenance or compliance, and restrictions on exterior appearance or modifications. Additionally, disagreements with the homeowners association over rules or enforcement can lead to conflicts among residents.
Some subdivisions are conditioned upon restrictions in deeds, as required by the Planning Board, and other restrictions may be imposed by the developer who owned the subdivided land where the community is built.For example, a community may require each owner to have a right of first refusal to another member of the community before selling outside, or may limit the types of structures or uses that may be made of the properties in the community (e.g., no home-based businesses, no buildings within 50 feet of the street).
False
He leans towards a Socialist Utopia world community, by word and deed.
That would depend on where you live. In states that recognise community property it does not matter if your name is on the deed, if you purchase the property during the marriage it is community property and both own it equally. In states that do not recognise community property, if his name is the only one on the deed, then it belongs only to him.
Giving up your money to the poor is a good deed.
give to charity or something like that. doing a good deed
If you are an owner, you may have the power to deny a quit claim deed. The association board is not in the business of authorizing real estate transactions in the community. A common-interest-community-savvy attorney can answer your question specifically, with more detail.
Yes, community property takes precedence. The estate cannot do something with property that does not belong to them.
If you are married in a community property state, then yes, it is a community property. The mortgage is irrelevant - it is whose name on the deed that determines ownership.
Common private community signs that indicate restricted access to outsiders include "Private Property," "No Trespassing," "Residents Only," "Authorized Personnel Only," and "No Soliciting." These signs are typically placed at entrances or boundaries of the community to communicate that access is limited to specific individuals.