No, a judge cannot close a case without seeing evidence. It is essential for a judge to review all relevant evidence before making a decision in a case.
To judge over head without possessing adequate evidence.
Ask the judge
A successful close to a judge typically means that the attorney effectively summarized their case, highlighted key points, addressed counterarguments, and left a lasting impression that supports their position. It should leave the judge feeling confident in the attorney's argument and evidence presented.
Yes but you need to provide compelling evidence to the court. The judge will review the evidence and issue a ruling.Yes but you need to provide compelling evidence to the court. The judge will review the evidence and issue a ruling.Yes but you need to provide compelling evidence to the court. The judge will review the evidence and issue a ruling.Yes but you need to provide compelling evidence to the court. The judge will review the evidence and issue a ruling.
if an unlawful search of your property/residence/vehicle is conducted without your consent, and evidence of a crime is found, its an illegal search, the judge can throw out the evidence if an illegal search was done
Evidence. Without it, you can't get a judge to do the case. It also doesn't hurt to have a lawyer on you side.
Take it with you. The judge will ask you questions and, if you need your evidence, show it to him then.
Yes, it happens quite frequently. If the judge holds a hearing at which both sides present their evidence, information and documentation, if it is clear, under the law, which party is the prevailing party, the judge can render a legally binding decision. If you do not agree you may file an appeal to the judge's decision.
There is little surviving evidence to judge Rome's accomplishments in the field of music.
In cases with a jury, the judge is responsible for insuring that the law is followed, and the jury determines the facts. In cases without a jury, the judge also is the finder of fact and has to listen to the evidence without passing judgment until all sides of the story are heard, A judge is to be impartial, fair and unbiased and to follow the laws of the state they are in and the United States Constitution and the Constitution of whatever state they are in.
A trial involves a formal examination of evidence and witnesses to decide a legal case, often with a judge and jury present. A hearing is a legal proceeding where arguments or evidence are presented to a judge for a decision on a specific issue within a case, without the full process of a trial.
In cases with a jury, the judge is responsible for insuring that the law is followed, and the jury determines the facts. In cases without a jury, the judge also is the finder of fact and has to listen to the evidence without passing judgment until all sides of the story are heard, A judge is to be impartial, fair and unbiased and to follow the laws of the state they are in and the United States Constitution and the Constitution of whatever state they are in.