0
yes because, there is a lack of real evidence, like body sample, evidence from the footage, eyewitnesses, etc, hence a conviction is made
What else can I help you with?
Can someone be convicted based solely on testimony without any physical evidence or other corroborating proof?
Yes, someone can be convicted based solely on testimony without physical evidence or other corroborating proof. Testimony alone can be enough to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law, as long as the testimony is credible and persuasive to the jury or judge.
Can someone be convicted based solely upon a confession?
yes A person can be arrested based on a confession; getting a conviction is another story. Although it happens often especially if a defendant pleads guilty, juries may want more information to convict than solely on the confession. That's why you need a lawyer.
What is the only type of trial that is not by jury?
A defendant can request to be tried by the judge alone. He cannot be forced to do this by any governmental power. It is solely the choice of the defendant.
Can a person be convicted of a crime without proper evidence the accusor states that she thinks he had a gun in the discovery?
People have been convicted without proper evidence. The accusation should be investigated; perhaps you did have a gun and fear a conviction based solely on her testimony. I don't know how to prove a negative (that you did not have a gun), but if you did there are other ways to show it besides her say so; other people saw it, there is other evidence of a gun in your possession like bullets or a gun box. This is why you need a lawyer.
What is the role and function of the jury?
in a criminal case to determine if the prosecution proved the accused's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt or not....in a civil case to determine if the defendant is liable to the plaintiff as a result of his (the defendant's) action or failure to act and if so to what extent
Can a convicted felon own ahandgun in fl?
Based solely on the information provided in the question, NO, they may not legally own or possess a firearm.
Why has Dr Aafia been convicted by a jury in the US?
Nobel peace prize 2009 was awarded to Obama solely to dissociate the USA from everything that could be linked to conscience and morality on any count. Hence, Dr Aafia stands convicted.
How do you use allude in a sentence when referring to detective?
"What you allude to is based solely upon supposition, you errant detective, you!", exclaimed the defendant. If the detective wishes to allude to gossip, please disallow his/her testimony.
What question was the jury asked to be on a murder jury?
The jury in a murder trial is typically asked whether they can fairly and impartially evaluate the evidence presented and determine the defendant's guilt or innocence based solely on that evidence, without bias or preconceived notions. They may also be questioned about their views on the death penalty, if applicable, and whether they can follow the judge's instructions on the law. Additionally, jurors are often asked about their personal experiences or beliefs that might affect their judgment in the case.
Would it be good or bad for a jurier to draw an inference?
Not sure what you are asking. Draw an inference from WHAT? Draw an inference from WHO? Jurors are supposed to try a defendant based solely on the FACTS produced in evidence and testimony and as instructed by the judge. Given that... jurors are all human. If there is any doubt about anything, the time to hash it all out is in the jury room during deliberation with your fellow jurors.
Is word against word a strong evidence in court?
Word against word, or testimonial evidence, can be considered in court but is generally weaker than other types of evidence such as physical evidence or documents. It can be challenging to determine credibility and reliability in a situation where it is one person's word against another. Additional evidence or corroboration may be necessary to support a case based solely on testimonial evidence.
Can you be convicted on home invasion 2ND degree solely on someones statement that stated that you knew where to do a crime not that you actually did it?
If you assisted or encouraged the crime, yes. You don't necessarily have to be present to be a part of the criminal activity.
