a home owner can and will be held responsible for a unlicensed contractor even if it is not complete or done wrong it is on you due to fact you hired them all ways all ways get a contractor that is licensed insured and bonded and allso do some research on them and allways have a inspector involved on big projects just better safe then sorry
Generally, a homeowner may be held responsible for injuries to a contractor on their property if the injury resulted from a hazardous condition that the homeowner knew about or should have known about but failed to address. However, contractors are typically considered to be skilled professionals responsible for their own safety; therefore, liability may depend on the specifics of the situation, including the nature of the injury and the contractual agreements in place. It's advisable for both homeowners and contractors to have insurance and clear contracts to mitigate potential liabilities.
You could be held responsible for any and all damages.
The contractor is held responsible, even if third party workers are contracted to do the work.
Both are held liable.
Generally, a person who hires a contractor is not liable for the contractor's torts, as the contractor is considered an independent entity responsible for their own actions. However, there are exceptions, such as when the work involves inherently dangerous activities or if the hiring party retains control over the work. Additionally, if the hiring party negligently selects the contractor, they may also be held liable. Ultimately, liability can depend on the specific circumstances and jurisdiction.
Yep, If you received notification and took no reasonable and prudent action to mitigate a loss you can be held liable through negligence for the damages incurred.
Liability of individuals, corporations, or partnerships for accidents caused by people other than employees for whose acts or omissions the corporations or partnerships are responsible. This particular situation may arise when an independent contractor is hired. The business can be held liable for negligent acts of the contractor to the extent that its representatives give directions or exercise control over the contractor's employees.
an electrical contractor
Your question assumes that the deed holder and the owner are two separate people, one or both of which have their name on the deed. Or, the deed is held by a bank, or other entity. Association assessments are the responsibility of the owner listed on the deed, whether the owner or deed holder is a resident or not.
The phrase 'held to answer' means held responsible.
Not really enough information contained in the question. What do you mean by "the budgeted amount?" Did he have access to the account in which the money was held? Does the money he took, exceed his expenses, costs, and outlay? What contracts were in force? Etc.
An independent contractor refers to a person who is self-employed. An independent contractor may also be referred to as a freelancer.