A Judge can do whatever he/she wants, especially in child matters. If at the time of the hearing evidence is presented that shows a change is needed and such change is in the manifest best interest of the child, a Judge will eat crow and worry about the consequences with the appellate later rather than leave a child behind.
Laws and precedents require a judge to rule on matters brought before a court. It sounds like you may be asking about a Writ of Habeas Corpus, which is a legal action requesting the court to rule on the appropriateness of continuing to hold a prisoner.
Exclusive jurisdiction
In a motion for summary judgment, a judge is not required to rule on the admissibility of evidence in the same way they would during a trial. However, the judge must consider only evidence that is admissible under the rules of evidence when deciding the motion. If the evidence presented is not admissible, it cannot be used to support or oppose the motion, and the judge may need to address these issues to ensure a fair ruling. Ultimately, the judge's focus is on whether there are genuine disputes of material fact that warrant a trial.
A law cannot prevent a judge's decsion as the judge is sworn to abide by the law in accordance with the facts that are presented to them in court.The judge, personally, may not care for the decision they are forced to render, but they must rule in accordance with the law as it is written, or risk having their decision overturned on appeal.
A "stay" can only be issued by a judge. If a stay is desired by a participant in the case, their only option is to present a motion to the judge requesting it. The judge will consider and rule on your motion either granting it, or not.
A judge may not rule in favor of Child Protective Services (CPS) if the evidence presented does not convincingly demonstrate that a child's safety or welfare is at risk. Additionally, if there are concerns regarding the legality or appropriateness of CPS's actions, such as violations of due process or inadequate investigation, the judge may side against them. Furthermore, a judge might prioritize family unity or consider the parents' rights if they believe there are sufficient protective measures in place. Ultimately, the decision hinges on the best interests of the child as determined by the evidence and arguments presented.
Judge Harding of Malta refers to Judge Michael Harding, a prominent figure in the Maltese judiciary. He served as a judge in the Civil Court and was known for his contributions to legal matters in Malta. His tenure included adjudication on various important cases, and he was recognized for his commitment to justice and the rule of law.
Judge will rule on the case as it is presented. Most likely granting the divorce as long as you have proven the facts in the bill of complaint.
The ball must be presented once. The ball must only be presented once. This is done by putting the ball in the glove before starting the pitch.
If a motion in limine is made, the judge may rule on the admissibility of certain evidence before the trial begins. This helps to prevent potentially prejudicial or irrelevant information from being presented to the jury. The judge can grant or deny the motion, or may also decide to defer ruling until the evidence is presented in court. Ultimately, the decision aims to ensure a fair trial by maintaining the integrity of the proceedings.
That'a question only the judge can rule on, but - he has to be asked (in the form of a motion) to rule on it.
The judge's function in a trial by jury, is to rule on matters of law and evidence and ensure the trial is conducted properly in accordance with applicable law. But, it is the jury's verdict which IS the final decision. Depending upon the type of trial the judge MAY have some leeway in in sentencing or levying a punishment or fine.