Yes. A jury can ignore the direction of a judge to a certain extent. Juries are free in the United States. Sometimes they decide that a defendant should not pay in a lawsuit. Sometimes in a criminal case they decide to ignore a particular instruction. In a criminal case, a jury can not find a defendant guilty of a crime he has not been charged with. They can ignore the judges instructions and find him not guilty.
Additional Answer:
There are two types of "directions" on jury trials. One is as to the law to be applied to the case. The other is as to findings of facts in a given case.
As to directions on the law to be applied to the case, in both civil and criminal cases,the jury must follow the court's direction. Juries are not familiar with the strict elements of either a tort or crime, so the judge explains them to the jury and the jury is bound to follow them in reaching its decision. The jury's province is in determining the facts. Its verdict is then given after applying the law as explained to them by the court to the facts that they have found. In civil cases, if it is clear that the jury's verdict cannot possibly be correct if the law as explained to them had been applied, the verdict can be reversed on appeal. In criminal cases, it is different, but not because juries are free to disregard a judge's directions. There is no appeal from a mistaken "not guilty" verdict because the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution forbids retrials under the double jeopardy rule.
As to directions on findings of facts, in civil and criminal cases, judges may instruct a jury to find a particular fact, if that fact has been proved as a matter of law. In a civil case, if a jury returns with a finding contrary to the court's direction, the judgment could be reversed on appeal. In a criminal case, however, there is no appeal again because of the double jeopardy rule, not because of freedom to ignore directions.
In civil cases, judges may very well even direct that a jury find in favor of a plaintiff or defendant and the jury is bound to comply or the judgment will be set aside probably by the trial judge himself. In criminal cases, judges are not permitted to direct a finding of "guilty".
defer, ignore, not judge
Not surprisingly, a Judge and Jury act as judge and jury.
A judge can overrule a jury when there is a legal error in the jury's decision or if the judge believes the jury's decision is not supported by the evidence presented in the case.
Typically, the judge enters the courtroom first, followed by the jury. The judge takes their seat at the bench, and once the judge is in place, the jury is brought in. This order underscores the judge's role as the presiding authority in the courtroom. After the judge and jury are seated, the proceedings can commence.
a person of a jury picked by the jury or the judge
a person of a jury picked by the jury or the judge
The role of a judge in a jury trial is to see if the suspect get to life or die
A "bench trial" is a case heard by a judge without a jury. In a jury case, the jury decides the facts of the case -- what is true and not true -- and the judge decides the law. In a bench trial, the judge determines the facts and the law.
A grand jury can not reduce a charge. Only the judge can make decisions like that. The grand jury can make suggestions to the judge and the judge can decide for or against it.
When a judge gives the jury "instructions," what that means is that the judge is "instructing" the jury on the applicable law or laws which the jury must consider in deliberating their decision. The judge is NOT instructing them on how to rule.
lords was the judge and jury whenever a dispute needed to be settled. He was also the judge and jury for dispute between his various vassals.
In a jury trial, the jury determines what facts are true. The judge plays a referee and determines what is admissible at law, what law is relevant, and makes sure the trial is run by the rules. In a jury trial, the judge performs both roles.