A supreme constitution and an inflexible constitution are not necessarily the same, though they can overlap. A supreme constitution is the highest law of the land, establishing the framework for government and law, while an inflexible constitution is one that is challenging to amend or change. While a supreme constitution may be inflexible, not all supreme constitutions possess this characteristic; some may allow for easier amendments. Thus, while related, the two terms highlight different aspects of constitutional law.
A thing which is not categorised
The Judicial Branch of government is vested with the authority to interpret the Constitution and ensure that laws adhere to the spirit and letter of the Constitution. It is also responsible for determining how a laws are interpreted and applied.As the highest court in the nation, the US Supreme Courtis the ultimate authority on the interpretation of laws and the Constitution.However, through the system of checks and balances, the Supreme Court does not have the final say on what the Constitution is. The Congress, with the several States, has the authority to amend (change) the Constitution, thus potentially overturning a Supreme Court decision. This is a difficult and time-consuming thing to accomplish and so is not often done.
No. The Supreme Court's interpretation of the Constitution and federal laws is definitive. There are situations where a federal agency (or the Federal Reserve) could change its policy slightly to try to work around a Supreme Court decision while still basically doing the same thing, but that isn't "overriding" the Supreme Court.
In the US, the Constitution and the Constitution of the United States is the same thing; they aren't two different documents, so there is no "both."Yes, Article III of the Constitution (aka US Constitution, Constitution of the United States) required Congress to establish one Supreme Court, and also permitted them to create whatever "inferior courts" (meaning lower than the Supreme Court) they needed to handle the federal government's legal business.Article III, Section I"The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behaviour, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office."
Depends how you view them, could be categorised also as rock or indie NO. They're Stated as Alternitive in the iStore thing.
The supreme law of the land. The United States system of law is based on this document. It is the word. A link is provided to the Wikipedia article on the Constitution. And you can read the whole thing there. It isn't that long, and each article is broken down if you want more information.
No such thing as an interim constitution.
Yes. Article VI. Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution, also known as "The Supremacy Clause," states: "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding." So, the Constitution, laws, and treaties are the supreme forms of law in the U.S. legal system. This means that all state courts must fall under the jurisdiction of these before their own laws or constitutions. Basically, the Supremacy Clause asserts the Federal Government's rule over the states.
The Constitution states the establishment of the government and the rules for that government. See the link below for the complete US Constitution.
There is no such thing as "informal amendment". The Supreme Court of the United States interprets the U.S. Constitution into the common law, and has been doing so, by and since Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803).
I don't believe that there is such a thing as a chess constitution.
Yes, the word 'constitution' is a noun, a word for a thing.