Laws are not applied in retrospect. This means that if a once-legal action is criminalised, people who previously did it will not get in trouble, as they were obeying the law at the time.
Added: That is known as an "Ex Post Facto" law and is forbidden by the US Constitution.
Ex post facto :)
yes, if he views the crime take place
It was only a theory, and no one had been able to prove it. He had is own theory about how the crime had been committed.
Citizens who make up a panel of inquiry in order to decide whether probable cause exists that a crime has been committed by the accused and whethr an indictment should be returned against the person officially charging him or her with the alleged crime.
the robber created another crime after he had been freed out of prison
This is called an ex post facto law. They are constitutionally illegal in the United States. Ex post facto is Latin for from after the action or after the facts.
Probable cause is a legal standard used to determine if there are sufficient grounds to make an arrest, conduct a search, or obtain a warrant. It requires that there be a reasonable basis to believe that a crime has been committed or that evidence of a crime can be found at a specific location.
Yes, in some situations, a citizen can make a citizen's arrest if they witness a crime being committed. However, there are specific legal requirements and limitations that vary by jurisdiction. It is important for citizens to understand the laws and risks involved before attempting to make an arrest.
The person who practice zoophile,likes to make sex with a lot of animals.
Police obtain warrants to conduct searches or make arrests by presenting evidence to a judge or magistrate, who then determines if there is probable cause to issue the warrant. Probable cause means there is a reasonable belief that a crime has been committed and that evidence of the crime can be found at the location to be searched or the person to be arrested.
because they are they because they committed a crime, and the judicial system goin to make sure they're there to be at trial.
If the sale was to a person to whom the alcohol should not legally have been sold, then yes. The fact that they are an agent does not of itself make it illegal to sell the alcohol to them, however if they are underage or the licensing terms have been breached then a crime may have been committed.