YES
The person who is entitled to property depreciaiton after repairs between the owner and contractor is the owner. The contractor comes in to fix things and if he doesn't do it right, he can be sued. But if the work was done right, the owner is responsible.
Liability insurance is required for contractors in many states as a requisite to work. It protects both the contractor - the worker, and you - the employer, from any liability if the contractor is injured on the job (at your home.) Basically, if he is insured, you don't have to worry about being sued if he gets hurt on your property.
It depends. if they are sueing you for non payment and its ur fault then yes. but if the insurance company holds the money and th contractors sign a waiver lien then no. they do that just to intimidate you.
When a contractor breaches a contract, they fail to fulfill their obligations as outlined in the agreement. This can lead to legal consequences such as being sued for damages or having to pay compensation to the other party. The non-breaching party may also have the right to terminate the contract and seek a replacement contractor to complete the work.
In Louisiana on new Homes 50,000 dollars without licences remodel 3,000 dollars without licences, handyman work should fall under this dollar amount but it is always good to get a licenced contractor if not you are considered the contractor and if anything happens you can get sued just like a contractor that's why it is a law that contractors have workers comp. insurance. Hope this helped
No, recommending a question or a user does not give you contribution points.
No, you can be sued for unpaid debts, but no judge is going to order you to sell your house in order to pay them. At most, a judge might order a garnishment of your paychecks.
The CMO staff is in charge of recommending functional skills. They are required to support.
Yes. But the contractor could be sued for slander of land title, and would have to pay court costs and attorneys' fees (if you prevail in court after a lawsuit) (in WA). Since I am a construction law expert, I will lend this advise: if the work is not finished or unsatisfactory, DO NOT PAY THE CONTRACTOR ANY MORE MONEY.Instead, write him a letter describing the unfinished or shoddy work and give a certain time period (say, 10 days) to come and fix the defective workmanship. Odds are, the contractor won't do anything, in which case you're free to hire a very good contractor to finish the job. Then, the shoddy contractor may file a lien against your property (just because he can file a lien doesn't mean the lien has merit). Once the contractor has filed the lien, unless you're selling or refinancing right away, or want to "get back at" the contractor immediately, I would do nothing and wait until the contractor sued me for foreclosure of the lien (note the time period to foreclose a lien in WA is 8 months). At that time, I would retain a good construction law attorney and counterclaim for slander of title (filing a lien with no merit) and breach of contract (since you had to pay the other contractor to finish the work) with a prayer for attorneys' fees (RCW 60.08.080). In the event the time lapsed for the contractor to foreclose the lien, or if no lien is filed, you will want to see a construction law or real estate attorney to sue the contractor (look in the phone book for an attorney who will give "free consultations").
The possessive form for the noun contractor is contractor's. Examples: The contractor's tools were at my house. I am going to the contractor's building tomorrow to discuss the cost.
The contractor may not be able to qualify for jobs, as most principals require proof of insurance as a condition of the contract; this is especially true for public sector jobs. If the contractor is responsible for damage to the property owner or others who would otherwise have been within the ambit of coverage, the contractor would him/herself be liable for the damages if at fault. Further, if sued, the contractor would be liable for the payment of his/her own attorney's fees and court costs to defend the suit. In contrast, one of the benefits of general liability insurance is that the insurer pays all or most of the reasonable costs of investigation, court costs, and hires and pays an attorney to defend the insured.