No. Debts incurred before the marriage belong to the individual, those made jointly during a marriage belong to both. Married couples who reside in a community property state are generally held accountable for debts made during the marriage regardless of which spouse actually incurred the debt(s). (Texas and Wisconsin do not treat all marital debt in the same manner as do the other community property states).
In most cases they will be held responsible. The spouse is considered to have benefited from the debt.
Yes because when you get married you are one so your spouse whould be responsible for their debt because that means their in debt to
In Georgia in most cases they will be held responsible. They are deemed to have benefited from to goods and services.
Debts of the spouse are considered to have benefited both of them. He can be held responsible for the debts.
They are typically going to be held responsible. The debt is used to buy goods and services. The spouse is considered to have benefited from these debts.
It depends on the type of debt. The estate is going to be responsible for the debt in most cases. Which means it has to be paid before the spouse can take anything from the estate.
Normally the spouse is held liable for the debt. The presumption is that they benefited by the goods and services.
Yes, you can be held responsible for it. The spouse is considered to have benefited from the agreement.
The estate will be held responsible. Given that the spouse was a card user, they can also be held responsible if the estate doesn't resolve the issue.
In Oklahoma, the deceased's estate is responsible. The spouse can be held as a beneficiary of the costs and by inheriting less from the estate.
The estate is primarily responsible. However, a spouse is normally considered to benefit from such debt and can be held responsible.
In Minnesota, a spouse is generally not responsible for the other spouse's individual debts incurred before or during the marriage unless both spouses jointly incurred the debt or one spouse agreed to be responsible for it. Minnesota follows the concept of "equitable division" in divorce, which means that debts are divided fairly, but not necessarily equally. However, if one spouse can prove that the debt is a joint obligation or that the other spouse benefited from the debt, they may be held responsible. It's advisable to consult a legal professional for specific situations.