William Livingston, a prominent figure in early American politics and a delegate to the Constitutional Convention, did not initially support the Bill of Rights. He believed that the Constitution, as it stood, already provided sufficient protections for individual liberties through its structure and checks and balances. However, he later acknowledged the importance of a Bill of Rights in addressing the concerns of Anti-Federalists and ensuring broader public support for the new government framework. Ultimately, Livingston's views reflected a pragmatic approach to governance and the need for consensus in the nascent republic.
English Bill of Rights
Not only did he support it but he organized the first formal call for the Bill of Rights
write a short speech convicting william and mary accept the english bill of rights
Bill of Rights
No. Not possible since William died in 1702, and the American Bill or Rights was part of the US Constitution, created in 1787. To end the Glorious Revolution, William and Mary signed the English Bill of Rights of 1689.
No he did not he was a Federalist, The Anti-Federalist wanted the Bill of Rights
English Bill of Rights
yes, he agreed completely with the Bill of Rights. He signed it.
No he wasn't.
yes
Bill of Rights
in the ghettp