explain sufficiency of consideration, by giving a case
Adequacy:noun: the quality or state of being adequate.Example sentences:The editor was asked to evaluate the adequacy of the reports.A teacher checked the adequacy of the speech.The judge based his verdict on the adequacy of the evidence.
sufficient is used when we suggest a close meeting of a need . adequate may imply barely meeting a requirement . (Webster)
No, consideration in a contract does not have to be a specified amount. It can be anything of value, such as services, goods, or even a promise to perform or refrain from a certain action. The key requirement is that the consideration must be sufficient and agreed upon by both parties, but it does not need to be quantifiable in monetary terms. Courts typically do not assess the adequacy of consideration, as long as it is legally sufficient.
You can request a restraining order through the courts. The judge will decide.You can request a restraining order through the courts. The judge will decide.You can request a restraining order through the courts. The judge will decide.You can request a restraining order through the courts. The judge will decide.
Some municipal courts are known as 'Courts of General Session' - such a judge would probably be a municipal judge assigned to the bench in that court.
true
In smuggling courts there was no juries just a judge.
In smuggling courts there was no juries just a judge.
In the United States, higher courts, such as appellate courts or the Supreme Court, have the authority to overrule a judge in a court of law.
There are no perfect rhymes for the word adequacy.
It means that although consideration must provide some benefit to the promisor or detriment to the promisee, these do not however have a great deal. Providing something is given in return for a promise, it does not matter that it is not much, or not what the promise would usually be considered worth.Courts would not inquire into the adequacy of consideration so long as there are some. The reason for this rule is due to the old idea of freedom of contract, which required that the parties themselves should be allowed to make bargains that suit them without interference from courts.
The courts of law are forums established by the Constitution to settle disputes. A judge or jury decides the facts of the case and the judge also governs the procedure according to the law.