true
sufficient is used when we suggest a close meeting of a need . adequate may imply barely meeting a requirement . (Webster)
explain sufficiency of consideration, by giving a case
seven years
It means that although consideration must provide some benefit to the promisor or detriment to the promisee, these do not however have a great deal. Providing something is given in return for a promise, it does not matter that it is not much, or not what the promise would usually be considered worth.Courts would not inquire into the adequacy of consideration so long as there are some. The reason for this rule is due to the old idea of freedom of contract, which required that the parties themselves should be allowed to make bargains that suit them without interference from courts.
Yes
Executed and executory consideration is enforced by the common law courts but a past consideration is not. This is because a past consideration arises where the work is done before the obligation or offer to pay is made. See the case of EASTWOOD VRS KENYON.
Yes, some jurisdictions offer night courts to provide legal assistance outside of regular business hours for individuals who require it.
The minor judiciary refers to the lower courts in a judicial system that handle less serious cases, such as misdemeanors, traffic violations, and small claims. These courts typically include magistrate courts, municipal courts, and justice of the peace courts, depending on the jurisdiction. Their primary role is to provide accessible legal resolutions for minor disputes and offenses, often without the formalities of higher courts. The decisions made in minor judiciary courts can often be appealed to higher courts for further consideration.
There is no measurable, quantifiable measure of this definition. It is a totally subjective view of the case, taken in its totality, by the presiding judge.
Lord Denning's view on consideration was that the courts should not be too strict in requiring consideration in contract law to uphold agreements that are fair and just. Some legal scholars agree with this perspective, while others argue that consideration is an essential element in forming a valid contract. Ultimately, the interpretation of consideration may vary depending on the specific jurisdiction and context.
No, consideration in a contract does not have to be a specified amount. It can be anything of value, such as services, goods, or even a promise to perform or refrain from a certain action. The key requirement is that the consideration must be sufficient and agreed upon by both parties, but it does not need to be quantifiable in monetary terms. Courts typically do not assess the adequacy of consideration, as long as it is legally sufficient.
Bankruptcy Courts are FEDERAL. You must be allowed to practice in a particular District by the Court, meaning you know the conventions and customs of the area more than anything. State is not a consideration.