A witness does not typically need a lawyer when testifying in court. Witnesses are usually called to provide their testimony and answer questions truthfully. However, in certain circumstances, a witness may choose to consult with a lawyer for guidance or representation.
No, witnesses do not need lawyers when testifying in court. Witnesses are typically called to provide their testimony and answer questions from the attorneys involved in the case. Witnesses may consult with a lawyer before testifying, but they do not have legal representation during their testimony.
It can be. It is up to the prosecutor or the defense lawyer. They need to be notarized.
No, you do not need a lawyer to serve as a witness in your case. Any individual who has relevant information or evidence can serve as a witness, regardless of whether they are a lawyer or not.
No, you don't need a lawyer but you need a witness
Typically, to be an expert witness in a court trial, you would need relevant education, training, and experience in the particular field in which you are testifying. Depending on the jurisdiction, you may also need to demonstrate your expertise through certifications, licenses, or publications. It's important to be prepared to exhibit your qualifications and expertise to the court.
Yes, but the judge may direct the lawyer to stop and let the witness finish. If you are on cross examination, the lawyer that represents you or called you as a witness will probably jump up and ask the judge to direct the lawyer to let you finish, unless you are rambling or need to be interrupted.
Depending on what your notice is for. If you are going to court to be a witness to an accident or a crime, probably not, if you are getting evicted from you home than 'yes' if you believe the eviction is wrongful.
No, you do not need to be a lawyer to represent someone in court. However, it is highly recommended to have legal expertise and knowledge to effectively represent someone in a court of law.
no you dont
Depends upon the court and the jurisdiction.You do not need to be a lawyer at all to be appointed to the US Supreme Court (although that is the only US court this is true of).In England, you need to be a lawyer for 10 years before you can become a recorder, which is the lowest level of open court judge.
If you want to win.
Sometimes. You would need to check with your lawyer to see if they are willing to do so. You also need to confirm that the specific court will allow it.