Yes since many can't be commited without the needed implements
Keep in mind though that In 2002, when Mr. Kelly last took office, officers stopped 97,296 New Yorkers and the city reported 587 homicides. While in 2011, those numbers were 685,724 and 532. Of those frisked (in 2011), a weapon was found just 1.9% of the time.
Donald Trump believes "Stop and Frisk" was a good idea. However, "Stop and Frisk" was ruled unconstitutional and New York City discontinued the practice. "Stop and Frisk" was wrong because it relied on biases about who to stop, examples: young men, young black men.Even if Trump wants to re-establish this, he cannot because of the court ruling.
It is unconstitutional and against the law because it profiles people.
The officer may perform a "Stop" when the officer has reasonable suspicion that the suspect may have committed a crime. The officer may perform a "Frisk" when there is a lawful "Stop", along with reasonable suspicion that the suspect is armed.
A stop and frisk is when a police officer stops you in the street and frisks you; much like they do in the Airport. It consists of physically checking your body for weapons or anything else that is illegal.
Independent Sources - 2008 Stop and Frisk 4-24 was released on: USA: 20 June 2012
Avengers Assemble - 2010 Stop and Frisk 3-2 was released on: USA: 17 February 2014
Yes, stop and frisk requires reasonable suspicion that a person has been, is, or is about to be engaged in criminal activity. This must be based on specific and articulable facts.
The stop and frisk policy in New York City officially ended in August 2013. This decision came after a federal judge ruled that the policy violated individuals' constitutional rights.
The Awful Truth - 1999 Stop and Frisk Night 2-8 was released on: USA: 12 July 2000
Yes, it certainly does. A frisk is done when an officer has a reasonable suspicion that you've committed a crime. A search is done when a police officer has probable cause that you committed, are committing, or are about to commit a crime. Read more about it here: http://www.californiacleanrecord.com/whats-the-difference-between-a-frisk-and-a-search/ This article was written by an attorney in San Francisco, CA and it really helps.
The landmark ruling that allowed stop and frisk procedures is the 1968 Supreme Court case Terry v. Ohio. In this decision, the Court ruled that police officers could stop and briefly detain a person for questioning if they have reasonable suspicion that the person is involved in criminal activity. Additionally, the Court allowed officers to perform a limited search, or "frisk," of the person's outer clothing if they believe the individual may be armed and dangerous. This ruling established the legal framework for stop and frisk practices in the United States, balancing law enforcement interests with individual rights.
Don't Sleep Hosted by T- J- Holmes - 2012 Stop and Frisk 1-8 was released on: USA: 11 October 2012