If they can show they are part of the community and not likely to be at risk of flight. That is, if they can show that they are likely to appear for trial.
Leonard is accused of murder in the second degree in a town in florida which court will most likely first hear the case
It is more likely in the opening statements.
Very likely, only Catherine Howard. Anne Boleyn was accused of adultery but likely not guilty of the act, with anyone.
Generally speaking, no. When someone is charged with a crime, they are usually arrested, booked and jailed pending their first court appearance (arraignment). At arraignment, the judge asks for and records a plea to the charges, and sets bail, remands the accused to jail without bail (this requires special circumstances, such as an unusually heinous crime and a risk of flight), or releases the accused on their own recognizance ("OR"). The latter alternative is used when the crime is relatively minor and the accused is believed likely to appear for subsequent court appearances. In the setting of bail or an OR release, the judge can place on the accused any conditions he/she thinks are warranted. These can include not committing any additional crimes, abstention from the use of drugs or alcohol, not leaving the jurisdiction of the court without permission, or surrender of a passport. If the latter requirement is imposed, the accused will not be able to enter another country lawfully. A bondsman posting bail for an accused person can also place requirements on their conduct before trial. If the bondsman believes the accused is about to skip out on him, leaving him on the hook for the bail amount, the bondsman can seize the accused and return them to jail, then withdrawing his bond and getting his money back. A judge could grant permission for an accused person to leave the country before trial, but would be taking a risk in so doing. If the accused were to travel to a country that does not have an extradition treaty with the United States, the court would be powerless to force them to return for trial. In order to grant such permission, the judge has to make a judgment call on whether he/she believes the accused has more to lose by fleeing the jurisdiction than by returning for trial and possibly being convicted.
opening statement
If the caretaking parent is incarcerated as a result of her arrest and the court is called upon to place the child in a replacement home, then the court will certainly prefer to place the child with a fit-to-parent father rather than to place the child in a foster environment. However, if the arrest of the mother does not result in her incarceration (e.g. if she is released on her own recognizance, is released as a result of posting bail, or is released under some agency's supervision), then a court is not likely to take her child away simply because she is accused of some crime, especially if the nature of crime of which she is accused does not suggest that strongly.
If the information is not enough to clearly identify the person accused it will likely be dismissed.
"Likely", no. But it has happened.
The accuser has to have sufficient evidence. It'll probably be taken to court, and if the accused if found guilty, she will most likely get fired. Any type of scandal ruins the reputation of the employer and the company.
Most likely it would be during the Winter because most likely its very caol and its not likely for them to survive in the harsh cold.
they are the mediator between the accused and the judge in the plea bargaining process since they prepare defendants for the likely outcome of conviction.
they are the mediator between the accused and the judge in the plea bargaining process since they prepare defendants for the likely outcome of conviction.