(in the US) Be faced by, and question, their accuser and the witnesses against them - to legal representtion - to be tried by a fair and impartial jury of their peers - not to expect any 'cruel and unusual' punishment. .
No.
it guarantees a person who has been accused of a crime the right to a layer even if he/she cant afford one.
In the Aztec legal system, a person accused of a crime had the right to a fair trial by presenting evidence and witnesses in their defense. They also had the opportunity to confess and seek atonement for their actions. Punishments were proportionate to the crime committed, and the accused had the right to appeal a decision to higher authorities.
A person accused of a crime did not come from Roman Law of Nations.
One reason why it's important to protect the rights of a person accused of a crime, is because the person might turn out to be innocent. The US Constitution guarantees the right to due process.
The right to have an attorney & be presented with the Crown's case prior to the trial.
Miranda rights
The Sixth Amendment provides the right to a lawyer for individuals accused of a crime.
According to the Constitution, every accused person has the right to a fair trial, which includes the right to be informed of the charges against them, the right to legal counsel, and the right to confront witnesses. Additionally, they have the right to remain silent and not testify against themselves. These protections are primarily outlined in the Sixth Amendment.
Citizens have rights, such as the right to remain silent, the right to an attorney, and the right to a fair trial, if they are accused of a crime. They also have the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty, and to confront witnesses against them.
The right to remain silent, which is proved through the US Supreme Court Case Miranda v. Arizona. He has the right to an attorney. He has the right to a jury of his peers.
how did roman law protect the rights of an accused person?