Your question is not clear. If you are speaking about a lead poisoning case you should ask your lawyer. You can add more details on the discussion page.
Your question is not clear. If you are speaking about a lead poisoning case you should ask your lawyer. You can add more details on the discussion page.
Your question is not clear. If you are speaking about a lead poisoning case you should ask your lawyer. You can add more details on the discussion page.
Your question is not clear. If you are speaking about a lead poisoning case you should ask your lawyer. You can add more details on the discussion page.
The parent could be held in contempt, result in a Change of Circumstance, opening the door for a change of custody.
It is not in the best interest of the child to be in the custody of a parent who violates the law. They exhibit poor judgment and could place the child in danger.It is not in the best interest of the child to be in the custody of a parent who violates the law. They exhibit poor judgment and could place the child in danger.It is not in the best interest of the child to be in the custody of a parent who violates the law. They exhibit poor judgment and could place the child in danger.It is not in the best interest of the child to be in the custody of a parent who violates the law. They exhibit poor judgment and could place the child in danger.
No, the child can not. The other parent could before the child was an adult. The money goes to the parent to use for the child and not directly to the child.
It could be if they didn't have permission from the adoptive parent.
As long as the child is not a cosigner on the debt, the child is not responsible for parent's debt. The parent's estate would be responsible for the debt. Technically this could reduce the inheritance the child receives, but it is not the responsibility of the child.
Depends if the parent has said that the child can choose what he wants, if the parent has then it is recommended that the child is given the choice of the school that they get to go to
No. The A parent could be AA or AO and the rh factor could be ++ or +-. The O parent can only be OO and the rh factor could be ++ or +- They could produce an rh negative child if both parents are +- (heterozyous). Since neither parent has the B blood group it cannot be passed to their offspring. (Rarely, a parent could be a chimera and in this instance an abberant child could result from a mating between parents that appear totally normal...the operative phrase here is "Rarely!").
Because you are not married and filed for child support. You have to pay child support to one parent and that has to be to the one with custody. If you both had 50/50 custody it could look differently but you only have visitation.
Yes
That person could not want to see the child or the other parent is not allowing it or the law/government disallows it.
What could happen if a parent don't send a child to school in n.j.
Drugs :)