The Supreme Court influences public opinion through its decisions on important legal cases that can shape societal norms and values. These rulings can spark debates, shape public discourse, and impact how people view certain issues. Additionally, the Court's interpretations of the Constitution can influence public perception of individual rights and government power.
Supreme court justices
If the reference is to the Supreme Court being influenced by public opinion then technically the answer is no because the Supreme Court passes judgment based on law. If the reference is to lower courts, then the answer is yes because jury by trial is based upon public opinion.
Public Opinion is a huge one. Since the eye of the people is so close on the Supreme Court given the consequences of its decisions, there is evidence that the Supreme Court is affected by the will of the people. Also, amicus briefs can influence Supreme Court votes.
When a Supreme Court "dissents" it is disagreeing with the majority opinion.
When a Supreme Court "dissents" it is disagreeing with the majority opinion.
When a Supreme Court "dissents" it is disagreeing with the majority opinion.
The supreme court must print its opinions so the people have record of it and can request it at any timeSo that they may be disseminated and become public knowledge.
The strongest type of Supreme Court opinion is a unanimous opinion of the Court, followed by a majority opinion.
The written explanation for the US Supreme Court's decision is called an opinion.See Related Questions for an expanded explanation.
The Supreme Court is insulated from public opinion to enhance their ability to make decisions based on law and the constitution without pressure from political parties or special interest groups.Specific answers to the other parts of your question are covered in detail in the Related Questions, below.
#1 constitution #2 public opinion #3 supreme court, and their you go
A US Supreme Court justice who disagrees with the majority opinion writes a dissenting opinion, explaining why he or she disagrees with the majority.