They bear no presumption of negligence and are only liable for the dollar value of the erroneous payment that is attributable to their actions.
Yes, departmental accountable officials can be held liable for pecuniary losses incurred due to their negligence or failure to comply with regulations. This liability typically arises when officials do not exercise due diligence in managing public funds or resources, leading to financial misconduct or inefficiency. The specific legal framework governing this accountability varies by jurisdiction and organizational policies. Ultimately, such officials are expected to act in the best interests of their department and the public.
Departmental Accountable Officials (DAOs) are responsible for ensuring the proper management and safeguarding of public resources within their departments. Their pecuniary liability responsibilities include maintaining accurate financial records, overseeing the use of funds, and ensuring compliance with applicable laws and regulations. If there are losses or mismanagement of funds due to negligence or failure to perform their duties, DAOs may be held financially liable for those losses. Ultimately, they play a critical role in promoting accountability and transparency in public financial management.
Yes, accountable officials can be held pecuniary liable for illegal, improper, or incorrect payments that occur as a result of negligence in performing their duties. They have a responsibility to ensure that payments are made in accordance with the law and regulations, and any failures to do so may result in financial penalties or other legal consequences.
If the offense cost money, the officer responsible is pecuniarily liable.
ANSWERABLE : (held) responsible (for), culpable, accountable, liable
DOD officials can be held personally liable.
Responsible means that someone is accountable or in charge. A way to say that in past tense would be that they took charge. They were held accountable. They were liable or accountable.
through the impeachment process.
Performance evaluations are used in these cases.
Please explain what you mean.
Monthly counseling and audits by the Financial Manager.
That depends on the local laws. In cases of necessities they can usually be held accountable. If it is not a necessity, the agreement could be voided.