answersLogoWhite

0

Yes, yes it did work actually it was very successful

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

How did Checks and Balances fail during Cherokee Indian removal?

in some ways it did and in some ways it didnt.


What are two ways that the checks and balances system didnt work in the caes the Indian removal act?

you suck it


What is the system by which each branch of government could delay or stop an action taken by one of the other branches?

checks and balancesIt is a system of checks and balances.


Why the power of judicial review is an important part of the system of checks and balances?

Judicial Review is an important part of checks and balances it keeps unconstitutional laws from being passed that would give parts of the government too much power or violate the constitutional rights of the people.


Why is the power of judicial review an important part of system of the checks and balances?

Judicial Review is an important part of checks and balances it keeps unconstitutional laws from being passed that would give parts of the government too much power or violate the constitutional rights of the people.


Use checks and balances in a sentences?

Example sentence for the noun phrase 'checks and balances':The government uses checks and balances to separate the responsibilities of departments.


Controls given to one branch of government to limit the power of another branch are known as what?

Checks and balances!Add me on myspace AmandaAmor!


What keeps any one branch of government from gaining to much power?

checks and balances


What are synonyms of checks and balances?

The synonym of checks and balances is equal. Because it prevents the branches of becoming too powerful .


How do checks and balances limit majority rule?

The checks and balances can limit power by not picking an electoral


What is the reason for Checks and Balances?

Checks and balances allow the branches of government to equalize power. Without checks and balances, one branch of government could become too powerful.


How does the principle of checks and balances violate the theory of separation of power?

The principle of checks and balances does not violate the theory of separation of powers; rather, it complements it. While separation of powers divides government responsibilities among different branches (executive, legislative, judicial) to prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful, checks and balances allow these branches to oversee and limit each other's powers. This interplay ensures accountability and prevents abuses, maintaining a balance within the framework established by the separation of powers. Thus, they work together to uphold democratic governance rather than conflict with each other.