An evolutionist may view the Constitution as a living document that must evolve and adapt to changing societal norms and scientific understanding, much like biological species adapt through natural selection. They might emphasize the importance of interpreting the Constitution in a way that reflects contemporary values, particularly regarding issues like civil rights and social justice. This perspective aligns with the idea that both legal and biological systems are subject to change over time in response to new information and circumstances.
The Living Constitution.
The constitution isn't interpreted using evolutionists thinking. It is a foundation for government and by definition a philosophy like evolution doesn't fit within the interpretation of the constitution.
The constitution isn't interpreted using evolutionists thinking. It is a foundation for government and by definition a philosophy like evolution doesn't fit within the interpretation of the constitution.
An evolutionist is answering this question.
There is no interpretation of the constitution by evolutionists. The constitution does not address this theory or prove it right or wrong. The constitution is a foundation of government and a system of laws for the government. It is also secular in nature and does not promote any religious rites or traditions and instead allows for the freedom of religion.
i think Australia freely constitution.
Evolutionist .
constitution i think
What does Jefferson think will happen if the Constitution is not followed strictly?
Creation in the 21st Century - 2004 How to Talk to an Evolutionist About Creation was released on: USA: 2008
even when evolutionist rank higher in numbers, the creationist are well ahead explaining and proving most of their beliefes where evolutionist have many things unexplained.
they SIGNED the constitution...i think...i had this on S.S. homework..