Traditionally, the copyright holder will write an agreement spelling out the terms, to be signed by both parties.
Increasingly, skilled amateur artists and photographers are making works available with a Creative Commons license--essentially an agreement spelling out the terms, just as a traditional license, but not requiring signatures. With this, the artist can allow the work to be distributed and used, without being bogged down with paperwork every single time someone decides they like it.
Yes, unless you own the copyright to the image, or have authorization from the copyright holder.
No, providing proper citation does not make it permissible to use a copyrighted image without permission from the copyright holder.
To use others' copyrighted works, you need an exemption in the law (such as fair use) or permission from the copyright holder.
Contact the owners of the copyright or their agents. If you have the image in digital form, the copyright holder's details may be in the 'metadata' belonging to the image, look at 'Properties', or 'Info'.
Unless it would qualify as "fair use" you would have to seek permission from the rights holder or risk copyright infringement.
With permission from the copyright holder, yes.
If you wish to reuse a copyright-protected image, you need permission from the copyright holder or an exemption in the law.
Shriek is a copyrighted image. It is illegal to use this image without written permission from the whomever holds the copyright.Shriek is a copyrighted image. It is illegal to use this image without written permission from the whomever holds the copyright.
To determine if a picture is copyrighted, look for a copyright symbol (), the word "copyright," or the abbreviation "Copr." along with the year and the name of the copyright owner. You can also check the website where you found the image for any usage restrictions or contact the creator directly for permission to use the image.
It is an image that has been put as copyright. This means others may not use this image without permission, or legal action can be taken.
Contact the copyright holder in writing to request permission; be specific about your proposed usage.
Yes, an altered image is still considered copyrighted as long as the alterations do not significantly change the original work and the alterations are not substantial enough to create a new, separate copyright.