It depends on the facts of the case. The plaintiff or prosecutor would go through the evidence and present facts to show that each element of whatever civil action or crime they are asserting has been met.
During the trial, the prosecution presented evidence such as witness testimonies, physical evidence like DNA or fingerprints, and any relevant documents or records that supported their case against the defendant.
When a workman's compensation case is presented, the supervisor should
No. Evidence is only presented if the prosecutor and defender need to argue the case. The evidence is only used to prove guilt or innocence.
Yes, attempted manslaughter is a charge that can be brought against someone in a criminal case. It involves the intentional act of trying to kill someone but not succeeding in causing their death.
When a workman's compensation case is presented, the supervisor should
impartial basicly. Basicly if someone was on a jury and a case was presented where a guy stole something but the jury member already knew the guy and didn't like him he would be biased against him (he would go against him regardless of evidence) so unbiased means not showing favoritism or prejudice.
In the recent transgender discrimination case, the key legal arguments presented revolved around whether discrimination based on gender identity is prohibited under existing anti-discrimination laws, such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The case focused on whether the definition of "sex" in these laws includes gender identity, and whether discriminating against someone for being transgender constitutes unlawful sex discrimination.
Go to your local courthouse. File a small claims court case against the person. Show up in court and present your case.
A trial cannot be dismissed. A case can be dismissed before it goes to trial. A judge can allow testimony if it is within the bounds of admissible evidence, regardless of whether or not that evidence was presented at a prior hearing or trial.
the files are organized by case numbers
"Objection: relevance" means that someone is objecting to the information being presented because they believe it is not directly related to the case or issue at hand.
What could happen if transactions were not organized by case?