There is no time limit set by statute. If the case was heard by a judge (no jury present) he may take as long as necessary to review the trial material and testimony and to look into and research the applicable law(s) and previous rulings.
Yes, a judge can dismiss a civil case if there is not enough evidence or if the case does not have legal merit.
If it affected the outcome of the case, you can appeal the case.
When a judge breaks the law within a case, it does not automatically mean they lose jurisdiction over the case. Jurisdiction refers to a judge's legal authority to hear and decide a case, which remains intact unless formally challenged or removed through legal processes. However, any unlawful actions by the judge could lead to appeals, mistrials, or disciplinary actions, potentially impacting the case's outcome or the judge's standing.
Judge and mocercy
Yes, in a civil case, a judge can overrule a jury's decision if they believe the jury made a legal error or if the verdict is not supported by the evidence presented in the case.
A civil case is initiated by filing a complaint with the court, which outlines the legal claims and facts of the case. The steps involved in starting a legal proceeding in civil court include filing the complaint, serving the complaint to the defendant, the defendant filing an answer, discovery process, pretrial conferences, and ultimately a trial where the judge or jury decides the outcome of the case.
Can have several meanings - need more info. What kind of case? Civil - criminal - probate? USUALLY refere to a hearing held between the attorneys and the judge to discuss the outcome of a particular case but it can have other meanings depending on the type of case and how it is applied.
The civil case was dismissed because the judge ruled that there was insufficient evidence to support the plaintiff's claims.
In a criminal case it is the accuser. In a civil case - think Judge Judy - it is the Plaintiff
If a case reaches court, both sides present their story (or their 'evidence') before a judge or a jury. The outcome is then decided by the judge or jury.
That depends on what "decide what the evidence is" means. The jury does not decide what evidence is admissible in the court; that is up to the judge, and is one of the judge's primary responsibilities. If the attorney for one side or the other thinks evidence should not be admitted, they can make a motion to suppress or exclude it on various grounds, or object during the trial. If the judge decides that the jury should not consider a certain piece of evidence that was introduced, he or she can instruct the jury to disregard it. The jury's only role is to decide whether the defendant is guilty or not (or to find for the plaintiff or the defendant in a civil case).
In a juvenile court case, the judge decides on the appropriate course of action for the minor involved, which may include rehabilitation, community service, probation, or placement in a juvenile facility. The judge considers the best interests of the child, the nature of the offense, and any mitigating circumstances. The outcome often focuses on rehabilitation rather than punishment, aiming to reintegrate the youth into society. Ultimately, the judge's decision varies based on the specific circumstances of each case.