the three elements of a crime should be present ( motive, knowledge, and opportunity ) for the conviction of a person committed a crime.
If a person has not commit anykind of crime though he/she was convicted of that but atlast it was proved that he/she was not a criminal
In the US, the only time you can say a person is guilty of a crime is after they have been convicted of the crime. Until a person is convicted or admits guilt in a court of law, they are charged with the crime or suspected of the crime.
Admission removes the need for proof.
No, a person charged with a crime is not always convicted. The punishment for a conviction can vary depending on the severity of the crime and other factors.
Any questions you answered can't be used against you in the court of law.
to testify
Being charged with the crime is a formal accusation by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS- In England and Wales) that you have committed a crime. In the USA, the law enforcement or prosecutor charges I am led to believe. Same principle however. *It certainly does not mean you are guilty, and everyone is innocent until proven guilty by a court of law. It then has to go to court for a conviction or acquittal (guilty or not guilty) Thus, a conviction is basically a finding of guilt for the charge by the court (who represent the state and the community at large) that you have committed a crime and are to be punished for such offence, this is sentencing.
No they cannot.
the action of extraditing a person accused of convicted a crime!!! :))))
capitol punishment
A Pardon.
accused - yes; convicted - no