5 jurors
In a criminal case, typically all 12 jurors must agree in order to reach a verdict.
majority verdict The verdict of a jury reached by a majority. The verdict need not be unanimous if there are no fewer than 11 jurors and 10 of them agree on the verdict or if there are 10 jurors and 9 of them agree on the verdict
This is a great question! Often trial judges instruct the jurors to listen to each other's views, but there's no legal requirement that they do so. The reason it's necessary is that a jury verdict must be unanimous, and that often means that the jurors must either compromise or persuade some of the panel to change their minds in order to reach a verdict. If the jurors simply did a single vote with no discussion, very few trials would result in a verdict-- it's almost unheard of for all 12 (or even 6) to agree on the first ballot.
Yes. Juries are groups of 6 or 12 people given the task of finding a verdict in a case. Often, they must deliberate and reach a unanimous verdict. Typically, the jurors will gather in a room and discuss their individual impressions on the trial they've witnessed and reach an agreement on the verdict.
The juror's role in the courtroom is to listen to the evidence presented during a trial, evaluate the facts, and ultimately reach a verdict based on the instructions provided by the judge. Jurors must remain neutral and impartial throughout the trial, deliberating with fellow jurors to reach a unanimous decision when required.
Texas juries are required to reach a unanimous verdict in criminal cases, meaning that all members of the jury must agree on the defendant's guilt or innocence. If the jury is unable to reach a unanimous verdict, it results in a hung jury and the case may be retried.
In United States jurisprudence an Allen Charge is the set of instructions given to a jury when, after deliberation, it reports that it is deadlocked and unable to decide on a verdict. The purpose of the instruction is to encourage jurors to re-examine their opinions and attempt to reach a unanimous verdict if possible
It depends on the state
When a jury "retires," it means that the jurors leave the courtroom to begin deliberating on the case they have been hearing. During this time, they discuss the evidence and testimonies presented during the trial to reach a unanimous verdict. The retirement process is crucial as it allows jurors to carefully consider the case in a private setting without outside influence. Once a decision is reached, they will return to the courtroom to deliver their verdict.
The unusual aspect about the duration of the jury's deliberation can vary based on the complexity of the case and the evidence presented. In some instances, a quick verdict may suggest a clear consensus, while a long deliberation could indicate disagreements among jurors or a thorough review of the evidence. The predictability of the verdict depends on various factors like the strength of the case presented by both sides and how jurors interpret and apply the law to the evidence.
Prospective jurors are individuals who have been summoned to potentially serve on a jury in a legal proceeding. They are selected from the general population and may undergo a selection process, including questioning by attorneys and judges, to determine their suitability for a specific case. If chosen, they will hear the evidence presented during the trial and help reach a verdict.
A juror is expected to remain unbiased, listen to all evidence presented during the trial, follow the judge's instructions, deliberate with other jurors, and ultimately reach a fair and just verdict based on the evidence presented in court.