0
Alexander Hamilton would likely assess the constitutionality of a law by examining its alignment with the principles and provisions outlined in the Constitution. He believed in the importance of a strong federal government and the necessity of a judicial system to interpret laws. Hamilton would likely argue that the Supreme Court has the authority to review laws and determine their constitutionality, as articulated in Federalist No. 78, emphasizing the role of the judiciary in safeguarding the Constitution against legislative overreach.
What else can I help you with?
How would Hamilton decide if if a law was constitutional?
Alexander Hamilton believed that the determination of a law's constitutionality should be based on its adherence to the principles and framework established by the Constitution itself. He argued that the judiciary, particularly the Supreme Court, should interpret the Constitution and assess whether laws align with its provisions. Hamilton emphasized the importance of an independent judiciary in safeguarding individual rights and maintaining the rule of law, suggesting that the courts should have the authority to strike down laws that violate constitutional principles. Through this process, Hamilton envisioned a system of checks and balances that would ensure the Constitution remains the supreme law of the land.
What are the supreme court's job to decide wether law are?
Constitutional
Cases involving this decide the limits of the government's power and the rights of the individual?
Constitutional law
Who has the ultimate authority to decide whether or not a fedeal law or action is Constitutional or not?
Supreme Court
How does the supreme court control power of the congress?
When a law is passed the Supreme Court can decide if it is constitutional.
What is the supreme court rule called when they have the right to decide if a law is constitutional or not?
Never mind. Judicial review.
The judicial branch is to interpert?
If you mean the job then yes, they interpret our laws. By interpret, they decide whether the law is constitutional or not.
What has the author Jerome A Barron written?
Jerome A. Barron has written: 'Constitutional law, principles and policy' -- subject(s): Cases, Constitutional law 'Constitutional law in a nutshell' -- subject(s): Constitutional law 'Public rights and the private press' -- subject(s): Law and legislation, Mass media, Press law 'First Amendment law in a nutshell' -- subject(s): 1st, Amendments, Constitutional law, Freedom of religion, Freedom of speech, United States 'Constitutional law' -- subject(s): Constitutional law '1977 cumulative supplement: Constitutional law, principles and policy' 'Constitutional law, principles and policy' -- subject(s): Constitutional law 'Constitutional law in a nutshell' -- subject(s): Constitutional law
Can the contents of the Preamble to the Constitution be used to decide court cases?
No. The Preamble is just a statement of intent; only the constitutional Articles and Amendments may be used to decide cases and interpret law.
What has the author William C Banks written?
William C. Banks has written: 'Constitutional law' -- subject(s): Cases, Constitutional law 'National Security Law Supplement (Case Supplement)' 'Constitutional law' -- subject(s): Cases, Constitutional law 'Constitutional law' -- subject(s): Cases, Constitutional law
A proposed law or constitutional amendment the legislature ask voters to decide on?
In some states, an automatic ballot referrals allows voters to decide at regular intervals whether to hold a convention.
Who has the ultimate authority to decide whether a law is constitutional?
The judicial branch of government, of which The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is the highest authority.
