If the ring was charged on her account, then of course she can sue for the ring or the money. Even weddingettiquette states that the ring be returned to or kept by her if she wants it.
A suit can be filed, whether or not a judge would agree to hear it is a different matter.
If it is heard, the intended bride would get the ring or the cost of such, but not both.
If the female has the ring in her possession, then she does not have grounds for a lawsuit.
The groom should buy the engagement and wedding ring for his bride to be and the bride to be should buy the groom's wedding band.
The bride and groom choose the minister they want to perform the wedding vows.
The father of the bride and groom can give the wedding gift to them the day of the wedding at home or, they can leave the gift on the gift table at the wedding reception. However, if it is of cash value it is better to give the bride and groom the money before the wedding.
the bride and the groom is first, then the bride and her father, and then the groom and his mother. After that the bride dance with her new dad and groom dance with his new mom.
Traditionally no. The bride and groom enter as Mr. & Mrs. followed by the wedding party and the parents can follow behind or go ahead and mingle with the guests before the bride and groom enter the wedding reception.
She helps the bride and groom.
The bride and groom
yes
By the groom.
The groom buys the engagement ring and band for his bride to be and the bride to be buys the band for the groom.
It's possible, but I think the bride and groom should split the total cost for BOTH wedding rings.
The cost as a second wedding, as well as the first, is the responsibility of the bride and groom. Agreed... the bride and groom must pay.