Generally, all jurors must vote "guilty" to convict someone of a crime.
However, some states have laws that create "exceptions". Some states allow "all but one" or "all but two" of the jurors to vote guilty, and allow the conviction to stand.
In a criminal case, typically all 12 jurors must agree in order to reach a verdict.
It takes 12 Jurors to arrive at a decision. But a Jury only decides the guilty/ not guilty verdict, and all 12 Jurors have to agree on either guilty, or not guility or else the Jury has to try to convince each other to all agree on either guilty or not guilty. If that fails, the Jury turns into a "Hung Jury" and a new Jury is brought in.
5 jurors
majority verdict The verdict of a jury reached by a majority. The verdict need not be unanimous if there are no fewer than 11 jurors and 10 of them agree on the verdict or if there are 10 jurors and 9 of them agree on the verdict
No, they eventually agree that the boy is innocent.
In most U.S. criminal trials, a unanimous verdict is required for a person to be found guilty, meaning all jurors must agree on the decision. Typically, this involves a jury of 12 members. However, some jurisdictions may allow for a non-unanimous verdict in certain cases, particularly in civil trials or in some misdemeanor cases, where a majority may suffice. Always check local laws for specific requirements.
It must be agreed by all (12) of the jurors deciding the case.
Oh, dude, in a criminal trial, the defendant is considered innocent until proven guilty, so technically, if all the jurors vote for the defendant to be innocent, then they are acquitted. So, like, all the jurors would have to vote for innocence for the defendant to walk free. But hey, who's counting, right?
The amount of jurors that must agree on a case will depend on the type of case it is. In a civil case, 6 out of 8 jurors must agree to pass a verdict. In a criminal case, all of the jurors must agree and the vote must be unanimous or it will be a hung jury.
no
This is a great question! Often trial judges instruct the jurors to listen to each other's views, but there's no legal requirement that they do so. The reason it's necessary is that a jury verdict must be unanimous, and that often means that the jurors must either compromise or persuade some of the panel to change their minds in order to reach a verdict. If the jurors simply did a single vote with no discussion, very few trials would result in a verdict-- it's almost unheard of for all 12 (or even 6) to agree on the first ballot.
When a jury, in a criminal case, is found to be "hopelessly deadlocked" and unable to come to a unanimous decision - the jurors are dismissed and the judge will declare a mistrial. A hung jury does not reflect on the defendants guilt or innocence and it is up to the state to decide if there will be a retrial.Opting for a decision by a judge; the defendant gives up a right to a jury trial. The judge will find the defendant not guilty or guilty - move to acquit or move onto the penalty phase. The defendant may still choose to appeal after a bench trial.In civil cases, the jurors need only the majority vote to find the defendant liable vs a criminal trial where a unanimous decision is required. When there are multiple charges, the jury can return a verdict on the counts which they have agreed and again it is up to the state to decide to retry the defendant on the counts in which the jury could not agree or to drop / dismiss the charges.ADDED: In criminal trials there is no such thing as a finding of "innocent." There are only "guilty' or 'not guilty.'