0
Is it permissible to introduce new evidence after the discovery phase in a legal proceeding?
In general, introducing new evidence after the discovery phase in a legal proceeding may not be allowed, as the discovery phase is typically the designated time for gathering and exchanging evidence. However, there may be exceptions or specific rules that could allow for the introduction of new evidence under certain circumstances. It is important to consult with a legal professional for specific guidance on this matter.
What else can I help you with?
Is it permissible to submit evidence after the discovery phase has concluded?
No, it is generally not permissible to submit evidence after the discovery phase has concluded in a legal proceeding.
Is it permissible to introduce new evidence during a trial?
Yes, it is generally permissible to introduce new evidence during a trial, but there are rules and procedures that govern the admissibility of such evidence. The judge has the discretion to allow or exclude new evidence based on factors such as relevance, reliability, and fairness to both parties.
What does request for discovery mean?
In law, discovery refers to the right of each party to see the evidence that the other party(s) intend to introduce at trial.
Is it permissible to use recorded phone calls as evidence in a legal proceeding?
Yes, recorded phone calls can generally be used as evidence in a legal proceeding, but the rules regarding their admissibility vary by jurisdiction and may require consent from all parties involved in the call. It is important to consult with a legal professional for specific guidance on using recorded phone calls as evidence.
Is it permissible to use illegally obtained evidence in court?
No, it is generally not permissible to use illegally obtained evidence in court.
What happens if someone requests evidence in court but the prosecutors fail to present it?
You cannot "request evidence." If the prosecution does not introduce it at trial then there is nothing for the defense to request. If the defense has its own evidence they may introduce that. During the 'discovery' phase of the trial both sides will have, should have, listed all the evidence they intended to introduce. However, the failure of one side or the other to actually introduce it does not open the door for the opposition to demand that it be introduced.
What is an Amended Discovery Exhibit?
It refers to a piece of evidence that either the prosecution or the defense wishes to introduce into trial that has come to light after the discovery" process had already been concluded. "Exhibit" is just a legal word for a piece of evidence, and, "amended" means that the evidence list for the trial will have this addition made to it.
Is it permissible for new evidence to be introduced during a trial?
Yes, it is generally permissible for new evidence to be introduced during a trial, as long as it is relevant to the case and meets the rules of evidence.
Is it permissible to use illegally obtained evidence in civil court proceedings?
No, it is generally not permissible to use illegally obtained evidence in civil court proceedings.
In a grand jury proceeding does the prosecutor need to present all of the evidence the state has at this proceeding?
During a Grand Jury proceeding, the prosecutor isn't required to present all evidence in his possession. He needs to present enough to convince the jurors that there is enough evidence for an indictment.
Is it permissible to use a recording as evidence in court?
Yes, it is generally permissible to use a recording as evidence in court, as long as it meets certain criteria such as being authentic, relevant, and not obtained illegally.
In what proceeding does only the prosecution present evidence?
grand jury
