The US Constitution requires States to give "full faith and credit" to the laws and orders of other States. However, the mechanisms for enforcing spousal support are much more limited than those for enforcing child support.
California penal code 262 is spousal rape. The statute of limitations for spousal rape in California is 10 years from the date of the offense.
Yes, but the "extraordinary remedies" available to collect child support (interception of Federal and state payments, liens on real and personal property, etc.) are not available to collect unpaid spousal support.
yes
South Carolina is a non-spousal state. In other words, ownership and control of real and personal property is not automatically vested in the spouses. This change took place in 1996 with the elimination of dower and curtesy rights in SC.
In California: If are legally divorced, you don't have to let your ex-spouse know anything regarding your personal life. However, if you are collecting spousal support from the other party, beware, your spousal support will terminate. If you plan on not telling him/her and decide to keep receiving spousal support, beware, once he/she finds out, you will be responsible for paying back the money going all the way back to your date of marriage (with new spouse).
Yes you are very much entitled to it now.
It will depend on the classification of the crime in question. In California it is most likely to be one year.
An inter-spousal grant deed is a document that legally transfers property from one spouse to the other to. There are many ways to accomplish a property transfer, but two of the most common ways to transfer property in a divorce are through an inter spousal transfer deed or quit claim deed.
"A spousal support lawyer is an attorney who mediates between the parties and makes sure that everything is done legally, professionally and amicably when spousal support (alimony) is part of a divorce settlement."
See the FAQ section at www.laprenuplawyer.com. Historically, waivers of spousal support were considered to be unenforceable in California. But in 2000 the California Supreme Court reexamined California's long-standing policy against such waivers of spousal support in In re Marriage of Pendleton & Fireman, 24 Cal.4th 39 (2000) . In that case, the Supreme Court found that when entered into voluntarily by people who are aware of the effect of the prenuptial agreement, a premarital waiver of spousal support does not offend contemporary public policy. In response to the Pendleton decision, the California Legislature promulgated new regulations that limit when modifications or waivers of spousal support in prenuptial agreements may be upheld. Section 1612 (c) of the Family Code now provides that any provision regarding spousal support, including a waiver, will be unenforceable if either party against whom enforcement is sought was: (1) unrepresented by independent counsel at the time the agreement was executed, or (2) if the provision is unconscionable at the time enforcement is sought. It is impossible to predict what circumstances might someday cause a Family Law judge to conclude that enforcing a spousal support waiver would be "unconscionable." While we can surmise with a high degree of certainty that if, after a 10-year marriage, one party is worth one billion dollars and the other party has no assets is unemployed, and is completely disabled, enforcement of a spousal support waiver would likely be deemed to be unconscionable. On the other hand, at the other extreme, we can say with equal confidence that if, after a one-year marriage, both parties have assets of equal value and comparable incomes, enforcement of a spousal support waiver in a prenuptial agreement would not be deemed to be unconscionable. Between these two extremes, we can only speculate where a Family Law judge might draw the line between "conscionability" and "unconscionability." Unfortunately, since Section 1612 of the Family Code was amended by the California legislature in 2002, there has been little case law that addresses under what circumstances a Family Law judge is likely to find a waiver of spousal support to be "unconscionable." Until a more developed body of case law emerges that addresses this important issue, it is impossible to predict under what sort of circumstances a provision in a prenuptial agreement dealing with (or waiving) spousal support is at risk of being struck down on the grounds that it is "unconscionable."
in the state of ca. if you've been married 24 yrs you can expect to pay spousal support for 12 yrs.,
No. The man's body is his own, to do with what he wants. No spousal permission, formal or otherwise, is needed for him to have a vasectomy.