answersLogoWhite

0

It's not a question of "fairness" it is a question of whatever penalty your state legislature attached to that particular law. (QUESTION: Bernie Madoff (multi-billionaire swindler) cheated thousands of people out of their entire life's savings but never committed 'violence' towards one of them. Should he go to jail?)

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is the goal of the jury selection process?

Well sure,its to make sure someone is convicted of the crime they are charged with, LMAO,no really,its to provide a fair&impartial jury,so the defendant,gets a fair trial.....


What terms means that a person can punished for a crime only after receiving a fair trial?

It is called "due process of the law"


What is duly convicted?

Duly convicted means that the conviction followed due process of law, which means that the trial preceding the conviction was fundamentally fair. The conviction includes the sentence which shall not exceed the maximum punishment annexed to the crime of conviction. Under the Thirteenth Amendment, a convict may be enslaved for a period of time not to exceed the maximum number of years punishment annexed to the crime of conviction. Any punishment that exceeds the maximum years of punishment annexed to the crime of conviction is undue and fundamentally unfair, which puts it in violation of the Fifth Amendment's prohibition of multiple punishments for the same crime and makes it a clear crime against the victim convicts humanity.


Does the Fair Credit Reporting act outlaw the have you ever been convicted of a crime question on a job application?

The Fair Credit Reporting Act requires that a person be informed if a background check results in a adverse hiring decision. Does not checking the box enable the employer to simply ovoid doing this.


What must a person accused of a crime be offered?

A person accused of a crime must be offered a lawyer. If the person can't afford a lawyer, the courts will appoint one for free.


How was Elizabethan Crime and Punishment Was is fair or corrupted?

Elizabethan Crime and Punishment was unfair and was mostly done of accusations with no fair trials


What does the right to an attorney assure people who are convicted of a crime?

The right to an attorney ensures that individuals convicted of a crime have access to legal representation throughout the judicial process, which is crucial for a fair trial. It guarantees that defendants can receive expert advice, understand their rights, and mount an effective defense. This right helps to uphold the principle of due process, ensuring that every person, regardless of their financial situation, has the opportunity to defend themselves against criminal charges. Ultimately, it aims to prevent wrongful convictions and protect the integrity of the legal system.


What is criminal justus?

Criminal Justice is the system in every country or jurisdiction of ensuring that a person who commits a crime is brought before the court and given the proper punishment for his offense. It also ensures that a person has a fair and impartial trial if he is accused of committing a crime.


What does The right to a fair trial if accused mean?

it guarantees a person who has been accused of a crime the right to a layer even if he/she cant afford one.


How does the Aztec legal system protect the rights of a person accused of a crime?

In the Aztec legal system, a person accused of a crime had the right to a fair trial by presenting evidence and witnesses in their defense. They also had the opportunity to confess and seek atonement for their actions. Punishments were proportionate to the crime committed, and the accused had the right to appeal a decision to higher authorities.


How can impounding a car be fair if you were not aware that another person was driving it?

If you file a police report saying that the other person used the car without your permission you'll be golden. The other person will have to be charged with that crime. Also, be aware that filing a false complaint is a crime. I am not a lawyer, so feel free to double check this.


Is it fair methods to decide whether someone is gilty of a crime?

I believe that it is fair, if there is proof to back it up.