The racial composition of a jury alone does not automatically constitute grounds for a mistrial. However, if it can be demonstrated that the jury selection process was biased, discriminatory, or violated a defendant's right to a fair trial, it may provide grounds for a mistrial or an appeal. Courts generally evaluate whether the jury's makeup affects the fairness of the trial and the defendant's rights. Each case would depend on specific circumstances and legal arguments presented.
A hope and a prayer! Just kidding. All it takes is that the prosecution does not convince ALL 12 jurors that you are guilty of the crime (beyond a reasonable doubt). If just 1 of the jurors is not convinced that you are guilty then there is a mistrial. Doubtful that the state will retry you - too expensive, unless they really want you bad.
Grand jurors are called from a cross section of the public.Added; From the same pool of potential jurors that is used to call all citizens for jury service.
all people involved will be executed
No, there only needs to be a majority as decided by the number of seated jurors.
All 12.
It must be agreed by all (12) of the jurors deciding the case.
Generally, all jurors must vote "guilty" to convict someone of a crime. However, some states have laws that create "exceptions". Some states allow "all but one" or "all but two" of the jurors to vote guilty, and allow the conviction to stand.
All twelve.
Oh, dude, in a criminal trial, the defendant is considered innocent until proven guilty, so technically, if all the jurors vote for the defendant to be innocent, then they are acquitted. So, like, all the jurors would have to vote for innocence for the defendant to walk free. But hey, who's counting, right?
In a criminal case, typically all 12 jurors must agree in order to reach a verdict.
Yes to many things... like felony charges and you lose your rights too...or being still under probation or court terms, etc. Plus, most importantly, they are generally considered partial and will not be able to give a fair impartial judgment...holding grudges and such against the system. ANSWER Well first off, they screen jurors so 99.99999% of the time, this won't happen, but there are errors in the system. Most convicts would just mention it because they don't want to be there, but again, it's all contingent on what happens in a particular case. The first question is: "What was the verdict?" A verdict of NOT GUILTY cannot be reversed, no matter what. All 12 jurors could have been felons and the evidence could have been totally in favor of the Prosecution---they could have a video tape and DNA evidence---doesn't matter. If the 12 felons say NOT GUILTY and then all 12 of them say they are felons, there's nothing that can be done because it is double jeopardy. Now, a GUILTY verdict could be overturned and declared a mistrial for having a felon on the jury because felons aren't supposed to be jurors. But a NOT GUILTY verdict cannot be. Sorry.
State law calls for only 6 jurors and 1 alternate for all criminal cases except capital cases. the US Supreme Court held in Williams vs Florida that 6 jurors are sufficient under the 6th Amendment. Interestingly, an eminent domain case gets 12 jurors. If the state is going to take your house and pay you for it you get 12 jurors; if you're facing life in prison 6 will do.