0
The moral permissibility of torture is a highly contentious issue. Many argue that it is never justified, as it violates fundamental human rights and dignity, and can have severe psychological and societal repercussions. Others claim that in extreme situations, such as the "ticking time bomb" scenario, it might be considered permissible to prevent greater harm. However, the potential for abuse, false information, and the erosion of moral standards generally lead to the conclusion that torture is not morally acceptable.
What else can I help you with?
What does it mean to be morally permissible?
Being morally permissible means that an action is considered acceptable or allowed based on moral principles or ethical standards. It suggests that the action does not violate any moral rules or principles.
According to Kant, is it morally permissible to lie in order to prevent a murder?
According to Kant, it is not morally permissible to lie, even to prevent a murder. Kant believed that lying is always wrong, regardless of the circumstances, because it violates the principle of treating others with respect and dignity.
Is it morally permitted to tell a lie in order to avoid to torture?
It depends on the person and their point of view. I would not think it is right just something that has to be done.
Is moral permissibility the same as legal permissibility?
No moral and legal permissibility are not the same. Moral permissibility is what is morally allowed and legal permissibility is what is legally allowed. An act can be morally permissible but can also be against the law.
What are some criticisms of cultural relativism?
Cultural Relativism is important because, when taking into account philosophical moral views it is vital to remember that different cultures have different views on what is moral and what is immoral. Especially if you are trying to find one absolute moral rule/law/truth. For example what is morally permissible in one culture may not be morally permissible in another. Such as cannibalism. Say that there are tribes in Africa that believe cannibalism is morally permissible - so long as it's not from your own tribe. To us that sounds horrific, cannibalism is not only immoral but also illegal (keep in mind though that just because something is illegal does not necessarily make it immoral and vice versa(sp?)). Taking into account the difference in cultures allows us to view this act with less horror and more with a critical inquiry; which is important when searching for that ever elusive absolute truth.
Is moral permisability the same as legal permisability?
No. Although some laws can be perceived as based on morals, there is a difference. For example, you think that strip clubs are not morally permissible. While strip clubs are regulated, they are not illegal. Therefore they are legally permissible. The same concept can be applied to contraception.
Is it morally permissible in the Catholic faith to consider abortion as a means to save the life of the mother?
In the Catholic faith, abortion is generally considered morally impermissible, but there are some circumstances where it may be allowed to save the life of the mother, such as in cases of a direct threat to her life. This is known as the principle of double effect.
How do you use the word torture in sentence?
example = This punishment is torture to us! So you use it by expressing your feelings
Did north Vietnam torture us soldiers in the war?
no
Is the US Constitution morally based?
Yes i believe so.
Do women belong in the US military?
Absolutely, positively and morally.
What those it mean by culture gives us a range of permissible behavior pattern?
It means that with every culture in the world, different behaviors are considered "ok", or permissible. For example, some Asian cultures eat dog, therefore to them, this is a permissible behavior. However, this is far from permissible in most western cultures.
