differing values and scarcity of resources
Differing values (a.k.a. personal worldview) and the scarcity of resources.
Founding Fathers believed political parties were the primary source of conflict in a society. They viewed them as factions dangerous to the public interest. Their ideology called for the subordination of marginal interests in favor of the general welfare of the people.
Religious differences in society, i think
There are a variety of causes of political war. These include differences in political ideology, and the inability to come to an agreement dealing with inter-nation issues.
Conflict within a society. As opposed to inter-society conflict which is between societies.
Ronald Edsforth has written: 'Class conflict and cultural consensus' -- subject(s): Automobile industry and trade, Automobile industry workers, Consumption (Economics), Economic conditions, Mass society, Social conditions, Social conflict
Jean-Jacques Rousseau, a Swiss philosopher, described the importance of the general will in his political philosophy. He believed that the general will represents the common good of the community and should guide political decision-making for the benefit of all members of society.
What conflict do you mean? The conflict between, Mr Nolan or the fellow DPS society?
As long as there has been society - and as long as there have been philosophers writing about society - there has been conflict and there have been conversations about conflict resolution.
Morton H. Fried has written: 'Explorations in anthropology: readings in culture, man, and nature' -- subject(s): Anthropology 'The evolution of political society' -- subject(s): Political anthropology 'Fabric of Chinese society' -- subject(s): Social conditions 'Ideology, social organization and economic development in China' -- subject(s): Civilization, Communism and society, Economic conditions
When a society faces a serious conflict of opinions on political policies, three possibilities are possible: * a deadlock and its results cannot be predicted; * coercion and one side prevails through civil war or by other means; and * peaceful adjustment, or in other words, a compromise that all involved can live with.
As long as there has been society - and as long as there have been philosophers writing about society - there has been conflict and there have been conversations about conflict resolution.