This is in Bhutanese Context
Right to counsel or lawyer is generally regarded as a constituent of the right to fair trial, allowing for the defendant to be assisted by counsel, and if he cannot afford his own lawyer, requiring that the government should appoint one for him, or pay his legal expenses.[1] Article 7(21) requires the assistance of counsel for the accused in all criminal prosecution. This means that a defendant has a fundamental right to be represented by a counsel or lawyer during trial. It also means that if the defendant cannot afford a lawyer, in almost all instances the government will appoint one to handle the case, at no cost to the defendant. This right shall encompass right to consult or to be represented by lawyer at almost every important phase of the criminal process, typically from arrest through the trial.[2] This provision guarantees not mere right to consult and to be presented by counsel but it advocates that the suspect is entitled to consult or to be represented by the lawyer or counsel of his or her choice.
Under this provision, a person shall have the right to defend, consult and be presented by a lawyer or counsel so that the fair trial is not sacrificed at any cost. Right to legal representative is an elementary feature of the fair dispensation of justice, meaning no one should be deprived of his liberty due to his disadvantage. Moreover, this provision is not merely a guarantee of a right to counsel for disadvantaged persons, but it is also a guarantee against government actions which restricts the right of a person to consult or to be represented by the lawyer of his choice. In other words, a person arrested and put on his defense against a criminal charge which may result in penalty, is entitled to the right to defend himself with the aid or counsel and any law or government action that takes away this right offends the protection guaranteed by Article 7(21) of the Constitution.
However, the right guaranteed by Article 7(21) is an optional right. It is not necessary that person should somehow have a legal counsel or a person should consult or be represented by a legal counsel. The discretion lies in the hand of the respective person. It is individual choice whether he or she want to have a legal counsel or not. When person chooses to have a legal counsel the government cannot in any means restrict his or her right to consult or to be represented by a legal counsel.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_counsel
[2]http://criminal.findlaw.com/crimes/criminal_rights/criminal_rights_courtroom/right_to_counsel.html
LAWYER
Well you could speak with the lawyer about this problem.
In the United States constitution it is the sixth amendment that covers the right to a lawyer with Assistance to council right in which a criminal defendant has, under the sixth amendment, the right to be represented by council.
Of course the lawyer has the right to ask...and you have the right to refuse.
right to lawyer, speedy trial
Anthony Burns did not want to be represented by a lawyer because he did not trust the legal system and believed that he would not receive a fair trial. He also feared that involving a lawyer would prolong the legal process and increase his chances of being returned to slavery.
I'll consider this to be a vague question. If I had to rewrite the question, I'd put it this way: "In a court of law if a defendant is represented by his/her lawyer or attorney, then what is the opposite of the defendant's lawyer?" The answer in this case would be the prosecutor, also an attorney/lawyer, but with opposite goals.
No, in most cases, a non-lawyer cannot represent you in court. It is generally required that individuals be represented by a licensed attorney in legal proceedings.
No, in most cases, a non-lawyer cannot represent you in court. It is generally required that individuals be represented by a licensed attorney in legal proceedings.
Non-union employees have the right to be represented by an individual of their choosing in workplace matters, such as disciplinary actions or grievances. This representative can be a coworker, lawyer, or other advocate. Non-union employees do not have the right to collective bargaining or union representation.
The simple answer is: It can be, if you did it right, crossed all the "t's" and dotted all the "i"s", but if it is done by a lawyer, it is absolutely right.
It wouldn't be ethical.