0
Students do not shed their first amendment rights at the school house gate Why is the statement significant?
The statement "Students do not shed their First Amendment rights at the schoolhouse gate" is significant because it underscores the principle that students retain their constitutional rights to freedom of speech and expression even while in a school environment. This notion was established in the landmark Supreme Court case Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969), which affirmed that students can express their views as long as it does not disrupt the educational process. Recognizing these rights is crucial for fostering a culture of open dialogue and critical thinking within educational settings.
What else can I help you with?
Should students have their 1st amendment rights upheld inside of school?
The first amendment, also known as, freedom of speech, is upheld throughout the country, whether it be for students, or employees. So the answer to your question, yes.
What statement from the tinker v. Des Moines court decision best supports the reasoning that the conduct?
In Tinker v. Des Moines, the Supreme Court stated, "Students do not shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate." This statement underscores the principle that students retain their First Amendment rights while at school, reinforcing the notion that their conduct, as long as it does not disrupt the educational environment, is protected. The ruling affirmed that expression, even in a school setting, is a fundamental aspect of individual rights.
What was the most significant statement in support of the rights of states?
That would surely be the tenth amendment to the Constitution, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." Michael Montagne
Why does students in high school today have first amendment rights?
High school students have First Amendment rights because the U.S. Supreme Court has recognized that free speech and expression are fundamental rights that extend to minors in educational settings. Landmark cases, such as Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, established that students do not "shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate." However, these rights can be limited if the speech disrupts the educational process or infringes on the rights of others. Thus, while students enjoy First Amendment protections, they are balanced against the school's responsibility to maintain a conducive learning environment.
What was the failed constitutional amendment that was intended to give equality to woman?
The Equal Rights Amendment
What is the topic of the ninth amendment?
The 9th Amendment is simply a statement that other rights aside from those listed may exist, and just because they are not listed doesn't mean they can be violated.
Rights not found specifically in the Bill of Rights are protected by the which Amendment?
Fifth amendment
During school students have been cursing and getting into trouble for it. This is taking away the students 1st Amendment rights. Is this legal for the students to be punished for this?
Most schools have rules that don't allow cursing. As long as you have the right to say what is on your mind, etc., your 1st Amendment rights are not being taken away. Just say what you want, but don't swear. Everyone has rules that they must abide by.
Equal rights purposed amendment.What does the Amendment will take effect 2 years after ratification mean. Why this statement and what does it mean.?
it means that the amendment will be final and set once the Constitutuion approves it in two years.
Why New jersey v tlo important to us?
because it placed where students rights stood. so did tinker v. des moines, i think but this one was about the 4th amendment and about whether students were allowed to have certain constitutional rights at school>
What amendment from the bill of rights protects peoples rights to be a Muslim?
1st amendment
How does Fortas defend the majority decision that free-speech in school is constitutionally protected?
Fortas defend the majority opinion that free speech in school is constitutionally protected by saying that such an expression isn't disruptive to ...
