Retributive and restorative philosophies of punishment are most likely to allow victim-impact statements. Retributive justice seeks to balance the harm caused by the offender with a punishment that fits the crime, which can include input from the victim. Restorative justice focuses on repairing harm and often involves victims sharing their experiences and needs to inform the sentencing process.
he principle or law of retaliation that a punishment inflicted should correspond in degree and kind to the offense of the wrongdoer, as an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth; retributive justice.
The theory of punishment that argues that the reason for punishment is too stop the specific person and other from doing the same criminal act is the theory of deterrence.
Historically, most, if not all ancient peoples used retributive justice based on the theory 'an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth'. Most ancient peoples living in the 'Fertile Crescent' including the ancient Egyptians, the Hittites and the Sumerians used retributive justice. The Hebrews under Moses, used this brutal form of justice. Probably one of the most notable figures in the use of this form of justice was Draco of Athens. History names him as a 'lawgiver' who drew up his brutal code of justice circa 600BC. Some extremely radical forms of Islam still use retributive justice. The Aborigines of Australia do, on occasions, use retributive justice.
punishment theory
The four dimensions of justice typically refer to distributive, procedural, restorative, and retributive justice. Distributive justice focuses on the fair allocation of resources and benefits within society. Procedural justice emphasizes the fairness of the processes and methods used to make decisions. Restorative justice seeks to repair the harm caused by wrongdoing, while retributive justice is concerned with punishment and accountability for offenses.
Well, Macduff was getting revenge for his wife and children who had been murdered by Macbeth. You might call that retributive.
A person who studies the theory and practice of the punishment of crime and prison management is called a criminologist.
penologist
A criminologist studies crime and punishment matters.
yah, according to Abraham Lincoln he did.
Retribution is basically the principle of an eye for an eye. According to Ernest Van De Haag it is the paramount reason we should punish. The difference between revenge and retribution is that revenge is emotional, personal, and there is no upper limit (punishment is never enough). On the other hand retribution is rational, delivered by the state, and is just deserts. Try to take a look at the capital punishment debate article on wikipedia. There is a section on retribution that could help you out.