answersLogoWhite

0

Retribution is basically the principle of an eye for an eye. According to Ernest Van De Haag it is the paramount reason we should punish. The difference between revenge and retribution is that revenge is emotional, personal, and there is no upper limit (punishment is never enough). On the other hand retribution is rational, delivered by the state, and is just deserts.

Try to take a look at the capital punishment debate article on wikipedia. There is a section on retribution that could help you out.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

When was retributive justice first used?

Historically, most, if not all ancient peoples used retributive justice based on the theory 'an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth'. Most ancient peoples living in the 'Fertile Crescent' including the ancient Egyptians, the Hittites and the Sumerians used retributive justice. The Hebrews under Moses, used this brutal form of justice. Probably one of the most notable figures in the use of this form of justice was Draco of Athens. History names him as a 'lawgiver' who drew up his brutal code of justice circa 600BC. Some extremely radical forms of Islam still use retributive justice. The Aborigines of Australia do, on occasions, use retributive justice.


Does Aristotle believe in strict retributive justice?

yah, according to Abraham Lincoln he did.


What role is played by retributive justice in the murder of Macbeth by MacDuff?

Well, Macduff was getting revenge for his wife and children who had been murdered by Macbeth. You might call that retributive.


What justice also known as the eye for an eye approach the perpetrator of crime is punished with the same wrong that he committed on the victim?

Retributive


What philosophies of punishment would be most likely to allow victim-impact statements?

Retributive and restorative philosophies of punishment are most likely to allow victim-impact statements. Retributive justice seeks to balance the harm caused by the offender with a punishment that fits the crime, which can include input from the victim. Restorative justice focuses on repairing harm and often involves victims sharing their experiences and needs to inform the sentencing process.


What are the three principles of justice?

Retributive justice: focusing on punishment for wrongdoings based on the severity of the offense. Distributive justice: concerned with fair allocation of resources and opportunities in society. Restorative justice: emphasizing repairing harm caused by a crime through reconciliation between victims and offenders.


What is lex talionis?

he principle or law of retaliation that a punishment inflicted should correspond in degree and kind to the offense of the wrongdoer, as an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth; retributive justice.


What are three examples of different justices?

Distributive justice: concerns fair allocation of resources and opportunities in society. Retributive justice: focuses on punishment being proportional to the crime committed. Social justice: aims to achieve equality and fairness in the distribution of wealth, opportunities, and rights among all members of society.


What are the names of the justice models?

For the 2011 Justice models, i know Ava Allan is one ( I am friends with the official Ava Allan on Facebook), Peyton Roi List (Plays Emma off of Jessie, the Television show on Disney) and Vanessa Howard. I only know those people, but i hope it helped!


What is an eye for an eye justice?

This concept originated in the Code of Hamumurabi; a Babylonian (or ancient Iraq) law system. The concept suggests that it is perfectly morally justified to harm those who harm you physically with the equivalent amount of physical harm in return.


Is it true that The financial and human costs of the retributive crime control policies of the 1990s are now being scrutinized?

true


Expansion of proverb A Life for life?

The proverb "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" means that the punishment should match the crime. It suggests that justice should be fair and proportional, advocating for the concept of retributive justice where the offender should receive a punishment similar to the harm they caused.