It's true that most people have their own theories as to the identity of Jack The Ripper, I believe it is pretty safe to say that the Ripper was a man. Women do kill, and there are most definitely female serial killers. But they don't kill like Jack The Ripper. These crimes were committed by a male, most likely under 30 years of age when the crimes began. White, with a social class at least slightly higher than his victims. This was a man that had a great amount of anger and contempt toward women. He would have looked like a regular person, maybe even non-descript, and he would have been able to blend into the east end of London, Whitechapel and Spitalfields. And one thing is for sure, he knew the area. That does not mean he was a resident, but he knew the many streets and alleyways of Whitechapel. A woman roaming the streets with blood all over her clothes would have raised some eyebrows. On the other hand, the east end was full of butchers and furriers not to mention, some doctors, where blood on their clothes was a sign of success. This all points to a male killer. The Jill The Ripper theory makes no sense at all.
Catherine Eddowes.
To the best of my knowledge there has never been a woman undertaker that was an accomplice to Jack The Ripper. It is more common for JTR type killers to work alone.
Nobody knows who Jack the Ripper was.
jack the ripper made his crimes in whitechapel London
toon into casebook jack the ripper and you will get a lot of information.
He's not. Jack The Ripper was never identified.
No one was never apprehended as the Jack the ripper.
Jack the ripper is dead his identity remains unknown to this day.
Jack the ripper according to records he existed
Jack The Ripper was never identified or caught.
The Jack the ripper murders as we know, were in 1888. At 5 were attributed to him that year.
Since Jack The Ripper was never caught there is no way to discern his eye color. Short of a positive ID, we can only guess what the Ripper looked like.