0
What was the outcome of the legal case Eyerman v Mercantile Trust Co and how did it impact future legal precedents?
In the legal case Eyerman v Mercantile Trust Co, the outcome was that the court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, Eyerman, stating that the bank had breached its fiduciary duty. This case set a precedent for holding financial institutions accountable for their actions and established the importance of upholding fiduciary responsibilities in future legal cases.
What else can I help you with?
What is the role of judicial precedents?
A precedent is when the outcome of a case helps set the rules for future cases. A judge doesnâ??t have to use a precedent in the ruling, but precedents can be used to predict how a case will turn out.
What Decision made by judge in the various courts and used as a guide for future decisions are called what?
The decisions are called precedents. Precedents are used as a guide by future court cases with similar fact patterns.
What was the outcome of the legal case Plumme v State, and how did it impact future legal precedents?
In the legal case Plumme v State, the outcome was that the court ruled in favor of the State. This case established a precedent that allowed for the use of certain evidence obtained through a warrantless search in certain circumstances. This decision has influenced future legal cases involving search and seizure laws.
The principle of recognizing previous decisions as precedents to guide future deliberation is called?
stare decisis
What law is based on operating through the use of individual cases as precedents for future decisions?
Case law is based on the precedents and and legal principles applied by other courts in previous cases.
Decisions made by judges in the various courts and used as a guide for future decisions are called what?
They are called precedents. If the decision was made by a court with jurisdiction over a lower court, they are called binding precedents because the lower court is required to apply the same reasoning in similar cases under the doctrine of stare decisis.
What are prior court decisions?
They are called "precedents of law" and affect how similar present or future cases are decided.
What was the outcome for Jews on kristallnacht?
The outcome was a great many broken windows, and a terrible fear for the future.
What is the doctrine of precedent that states the decisions of other courts which are not binding on a judge?
There is no doctrine of non-binding precedents. Non-binding opinions that may be used as guidelines for deciding future cases are called persuasive precedents. Binding precedents are upheld under the doctrine of stare decisis (Latin: Let the decision stand).
Which was an accomplishment of Thomas Jefferson during his presidency?
Precedents were set for future presidents to follow.
The legal principle which says that court decisions stand as precedents for future cases involving the same issues is known as?
stare decisis
Did the outcome of Gettysburg effect future strategies?
frfiofvgitbvijfbgkjfknfhisfisfinipatatoehbfvfvovibfivhfivfivjivndfnbvvjijivnfjbdfbjfjbfbofnbifbjifibjifbfkbfko+lamahgrgingk;
