Changing the electoral college system in the United States would require a constitutional amendment, which involves a proposal by two-thirds of both houses of Congress or a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of state legislatures, followed by ratification by three-fourths of the states.
the cons of it is of the electoral college system. and it favors or might like to change it.
all states splitting their electoral votes between the candidates based on what percentage of the popular vote they won. (apex)
There has always been an electoral vote since the beginning of the United States of America. Such is the election procedure specified in the original Constitution of the United States ratified in 1788.
The only way to change it is by Constitutional Amendment, because it is set up in Article 2 of the Constitution as amended by the 12th Amendment. The sole leeway Congress has in the process is determining the time of choosing Electors and the date they cast their votes. There is another method. The Constitution specifies that States choose how their electors should be determined, and most states (apart from Maine and Nebraska) use the "Winner Takes All System". So a new proposal is the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact. Basically, if enough states agree to allow their electors to vote for candidate with the most votes in the country, the most popular candidate would always win. The electoral college would still exist, but it would be a mere formality.
The U.S. electoral system was created in 1788 by the United States Constitution. The first U.S. presidential election was in 1789. George Washington was elected as the first president of the United States. The election was conducted under the new United States Constitution, which had been ratified earlier in 1788. In the election, George Washington received all 69 electoral votes and was unanimously elected president. John Adams was elected vice-president. Since 1788 the U.S. electoral system has been modified by amendment to the United States Constitution. Further changes to the U.S. electoral system would require additional amendment to the United States Constitution.
When states with a combined total of at least 270 electoral votes enact the bill, the candidate with the most popular votes in all 50 states and DC would get the needed majority of 270+ electoral votes from the enacting states. The bill would thus guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes and the majority of Electoral College votes.
Electoral reform is the effort put forth to change the American elections. The proposals for electoral reform include overturning Citizens United, limits and transparency in funding and citizen funding of elections.
Ideas have been brought forth to do away with the Electoral College and elect the President based on popular vote. It was originated because the elite of society felt that the common man was not intelligent enough to vote responsibly.
The number of Representatives in Congress depends on the state's population in the latest census. The number of Electoral College votes is the sum of the Senators and Representatives that a state has (giving a minimum of 3 votes).
The electoral college is based on the population of a state. If a majority of the state votes for a certain Candidate then the state wins all the Electoral votes which is all the Senates and Representatives.
The electoral college system for electing the President is part of the US Constitution and so is quite difficult to change. Without any changes there is considerable leeway on how states choose their electors. Furthermore, it is not at all obvious that the system should be abolished. There are many objections to a direct election . No one has come up with an attractive alternative.
The main argument for making a change to the Electoral College is that it allows for a winner of the popular vote to lose the presidential election. However, two things need to be answered. If the Electoral College system is so bad, why does it still exist? There have been a few hundred years to alter it. Secondly, as with the US Senate, a small state has the same weight in the US Senate as a large state. It's clear the Framers believed that the states, the "mother" of the US Constitution, should cast their Electoral Votes, all of them to the winner of a state. The formula to change this is an amendment to the Constitution.