The term "Juvenile Court Tries Shooting Defendant" refers to a legal proceeding in which a minor accused of committing a shooting offense is brought before a juvenile court. Juvenile courts focus on rehabilitation rather than punishment, aiming to address the underlying issues contributing to the juvenile's behavior. The court will consider the circumstances of the crime, the minor's background, and appropriate interventions, potentially leading to consequences like probation, community service, or placement in a juvenile facility instead of adult prison.
Security in court is needed - in case the defendant tries to escape from custody during the hearing. It's also to keep order - and prevent people bringing weapons etc into the court chambers.
It is a good program that could help if he tries
No, this is a procedure used in criminal court when the prosecutor tries to get the defendant to plead guilty to the charge in order to get a lesser charge than a maximum sentence.
It depends. To begin with, the answer will differ according to what country the crime was committed in. For the United States, there are number of different possibilities depending on who is involved and how the crime is committed.Most often, murder would be tried in a state criminal court, but if the defendant is a juvenile, it may be tried in juvenile court; if the defendant is in the military, it may be tried in a military court. If the victim is any of a number of government officials, it becomes a federal case. In this instance, or if the crime was committed as part of another federal crime, the case would appear before a federal court.I'm not a lawyer, so I've probably left out most of the possible complications.
The answers are.. Judge: makes sure everything runs smoothly Jury: Decides at the end what happens to the defendant ( Guilty/ not guilty) Witness: Someone who has been there during the crime and gives evidence of what happened Defence lawyer/ prosecution lawyer: ( Defence Lawyer) someone who tries not to get the defendant in prison ( Prosecution lawyer) tries to prosecute them ( get the defendant guilty) Defendant: Someone who has committed the crime Clerk: Make sure everyone is fair and stuff Usher: Makes sure everyone is on time
It depends on how the court wants to try you. Depending on how the court tries you, depends on what happened (i.e. was the gun just drawn, was the gun fired, was someone harmed, was the gun in illegal possession, etc.)
The difference between the prosecution and counsel for defence is that the prosecution is the body that is representing the plaintiff who tries to convice the judge/magistrate that the defendant has committed crime while the counsel for defence is the body that is representing the defendant who tries to convince the judge/magistrate that the defendant has not committed any crime.
The court will accept that the sheriff made a reasonable attempt to serve the defendant debtor. That being the case the lawsuit will go forward as it is presumed under the law that the defendant has been legally served regardless of the non acceptance/signing of the summons.
Have the judgment recorded with the recorder's office in whatever state and county you are in. It won't help you collect on the judgment, but if that person tries to sell or buy property there will be a lien that will have to be cleared up prior to doing either.
district attorney
Say a criminal is accused. The criminal will have a defense attorney. In court, the defense attorney argues with the prosecutor. In his cross-examination with the witness, he tries to find a contradiction, to show the defendant is NOT GUILTY. In the end, the Jury declares if the accused is GUILTY or NOT GUILTY. It really depends on what happened during the trial.
Original intent