0
What else can I help you with?
What is the crux of john Marshall's argument?
The crux of John Marshall's argument centers on the supremacy of the Constitution and the role of the Supreme Court in interpreting it. He emphasized that the judiciary has the authority to review and nullify laws that are in conflict with the Constitution, thereby establishing the principle of judicial review. This foundational argument reinforced the balance of power among the branches of government and ensured that the rights enshrined in the Constitution are protected against legislative overreach. Marshall's decisions laid the groundwork for a robust federal judiciary.
A major argument against ratification of the constitution was the absence of?
The major argument was the absence of a bill of rights in the Constitution
What are the roles judiciary in Nigeria?
The roles of the judiciary in Nigeria is to interpret the constitution to the public. The judiciary is also tasked with listening to court proceedings and give verdicts in relation to the constitution.
What do you call someone that doesn't follow the constitution?
This would be an anarchist. There are many contries that do not respect the values of the Constitution of the U.S. that would also be considered against the constitution. For example communism, monarchies etc...
What was an important argument against the proposal constitution?
it did not guarantee basic rights
What was the important argument against the proposed constitution?
it did not guarantee basic rights
What was the main argument of the Antifederalists against constitution?
they didn't get to practice the Bill of Rights
What was the the main argument of the antifederalists against the constitution?
they didn't get to practice the Bill of Rights
Which reason best explains why many antifederalist finally agreed to the ratifraction of the constitution?
They wanted protections against tyranny of the central government.
Which argument did Abraham Lincoln use against the secession of the south?
I believe one argument he made was that there are no provisions for cessation in the Constitution. One problem with the argument is that according to the Constitution any powers not given to the federal government are reserved to the states.
Why was george mason a antifederalist?
George Mason was an Antifederalist because he believed that the proposed U.S. Constitution concentrated too much power in the federal government, undermining states' rights and individual liberties. He was particularly concerned about the lack of a Bill of Rights, which he felt was essential to protect citizens from potential government overreach. Mason's advocacy for personal freedoms and skepticism toward centralized authority reflected the broader Antifederalist stance against the Constitution as it was originally drafted.
What Articles from the Constitution could be used to effectively argue in favor of judicial review?
Judicial review is supported by Article III of the Constitution, which establishes the judicial branch and grants the Supreme Court the authority to interpret laws. Additionally, the supremacy clause in Article VI, which asserts that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, implies that the judiciary must ensure that laws comply with constitutional principles. Moreover, the framers' intent, as reflected in Federalist No. 78, emphasizes the role of the judiciary in safeguarding the Constitution against legislative overreach, further bolstering the argument for judicial review.
